Bug#779631: please make gemspec output reproducible
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:14:35PM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote: Chris Lamb wrote: I will therefore assume that this will fix itself once 2.2 becomes the default. Out of interest, is there an approximate timeline for 2.2 becoming the default? I can see https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Ruby2.2 and https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTransitions but it's unclear where we currently. Emilio from the RT asked to put it on hold until we are done with GCC 5. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789077#136 -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#779631: please make gemspec output reproducible
Chris Lamb wrote: I will therefore assume that this will fix itself once 2.2 becomes the default. Out of interest, is there an approximate timeline for 2.2 becoming the default? I can see https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Ruby2.2 and https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTransitions but it's unclear where we currently. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#779631: please make gemspec output reproducible
Chris Lamb wrote: It seems like this didn't fix it, or there is an extremely similar issue. For example: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ruby-rack-mobile-detect.html Ah, AFAICT this was fixed in an upload for ruby2.2, whilst ruby 2.1 is still the default version in unstable. I will therefore assume that this will fix itself once 2.2 becomes the default. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#779631: please make gemspec output reproducible
reopen 779631 found 779631 tags - patch thanks It seems like this didn't fix it, or there is an extremely similar issue. For example: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ruby-rack-mobile-detect.html I will investigate soon; apologies that I am reopening this without it being immediately actionable on your part. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#779631: please make gemspec output reproducible
Source: libruby2.1
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed
that libruby2.1 is generating .gemspec files with an output that depends
on the timezone.
The attached patch normalises the time to UTC before outputting. Once
applied, packages that use gem2deb, etc etc can be built reproducibly
in our reproducible toolchain.
[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
diff --git a/lib/rubygems/specification.rb b/lib/rubygems/specification.rb
index f4e609a..749f38b 100644
--- a/lib/rubygems/specification.rb
+++ b/lib/rubygems/specification.rb
@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ class Gem::Specification Gem::BasicSpecification
invalid date format in specification: #{date.inspect})
end
when Time, Date then
- Time.utc(date.year, date.month, date.day)
+ Time.utc(date.utc.year, date.utc.month, date.utc.day)
else
TODAY
end
