Bug#781062: unblock: cross-binutils/0.22
+++ Adam D. Barratt [2015-03-24 19:55 +]: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 23:06 +, Wookey wrote: Please unblock package cross-binutils (source) [...] The cross-binutils package versions should match the binutils versions so that cross-building and native building are consistent. This was the case in Jessie until binutils 2.25-5 migrated to testing (on 2015-03-06) replacing 2.24.90.20141023-1 Unblocks are source-based; one can't unblock binary packages (nor would it make much sense). Right, I thought so, but reportbug said it had never heard of the package and thus confused me. (So I thought maybe it wanted binaries, so I made a list in case that was helpful). and it should now be: unblock cross-binutils/0.23 --- cross-binutils-0.14/buildpackage2014-10-24 09:13:47.0 + +++ cross-binutils-0.23/buildpackage2015-03-23 23:16:33.0 + @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ # needs git-buildpackage and sbuild (outside the chroot) # and lsb-release inside the chroot -chroot=unstable-amd64-cross-sbuild +chroot=unstable-amd64-sbuild That change doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in the changelog afaics. That script is just a maintainer's convenience script for doing the release build in the right chroot, tagging git etc, without making usual human errors. It's not something that is used in a normal (dpkg-buildpackage) build of the package. I changed the chroot name so that it would work for most people using sbuild-createchroot chroots (i.e default chroot naming), rather than just for me with my oddly-named chroot. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#781062: unblock: cross-binutils/0.22
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 23:06 +, Wookey wrote: Please unblock package cross-binutils (source) [...] The cross-binutils package versions should match the binutils versions so that cross-building and native building are consistent. This was the case in Jessie until binutils 2.25-5 migrated to testing (on 2015-03-06) replacing 2.24.90.20141023-1 [...] unblock cross-binutils/0.22 unblock binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu/2.25-4 [etc] Unblocks are source-based; one can't unblock binary packages (nor would it make much sense). --- cross-binutils-0.14/buildpackage2014-10-24 09:13:47.0 + +++ cross-binutils-0.23/buildpackage2015-03-23 23:16:33.0 + @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ # needs git-buildpackage and sbuild (outside the chroot) # and lsb-release inside the chroot -chroot=unstable-amd64-cross-sbuild +chroot=unstable-amd64-sbuild That change doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in the changelog afaics. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#781062: unblock: cross-binutils/0.22
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cross-binutils (source) Binaries: binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf binutils-i586-linux-gnu binutils-mips-linux-gnu binutils-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64 binutils-mipsel-linux-gnu binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu binutils-powerpc64le-linux-gnu binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu The cross-binutils package versions should match the binutils versions so that cross-building and native building are consistent. This was the case in Jessie until binutils 2.25-5 migrated to testing (on 2015-03-06) replacing 2.24.90.20141023-1 As this has been deemed suitable for migration we should migrate the corresponding cross- builds of binutils too. Hmm, I see that the versions in unstable built by cross-binutils 0.22 are 2.25-4 (not 2.25-5), which have been there for 2 months (uploaded 2015-01-18) and thus could be considered to be quite well-tested. But there is one important-looking fix in 2.25-5 (#772958), so I guess an upload of cross-binutils 0.23, building binutils 2.25-5 would be better? unblock cross-binutils/0.22 unblock binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu/2.25-4 unblock binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi/2.25-4 unblock binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf/2.25-4 unblock binutils-i586-linux-gnu/2.25-4 unblock binutils-mips-linux-gnu/2.25-4 unblock binutils-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/2.25-4 unblock binutils-mipsel-linux-gnu/2.25-4 unblock binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu/2.25-4 unblock binutils-powerpc64le-linux-gnu/2.25-4 unblock binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu/2.25-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
