Bug#784724: transition: gloox
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Control: tag -1 confirmed On 2015-05-08 04:16, Vincent Cheng wrote: I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows): licq (build ok, needs binNMU) 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU) uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU) fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663) Please go ahead. Uploaded to sid and now built on all archs. Thanks in advance for scheduling binNMUs! Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784724: transition: gloox
Control: tag -1 confirmed On 2015-05-08 04:16, Vincent Cheng wrote: I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows): licq (build ok, needs binNMU) 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU) uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU) fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663) Please go ahead. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784724: transition: gloox
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows): licq (build ok, needs binNMU) 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU) uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU) fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663) Ben file: title = gloox; is_affected = .depends ~ libgloox12 | .depends ~ libgloox13; is_good = .depends ~ libgloox13; is_bad = .depends ~ libgloox12; Regards, Vincent -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.18-3-vclaptop-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org