Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
Hi Felix, Il Mercoledì 14 Ottobre 2015 20:21, Felix Zielcke ha scritto: >Thanks very much to both of you. >I created now a github fork for it: > >https://github.com/fezie/duperemove > >Though I didn't do much yet. https://github.com/fezie/duperemove/commit/958c4f520a6f9c2552f2b98a3bd1504ee2196073 lol :) (please fix) BTW, please upload on mentors too, I don't like to clone stuff from outside Debian (and please consider joining collab-maint and creating a repository there) >Thanks again very much. >You can't imagine how good that feels to me :-) well, this was directed to Mattia, who gives always useful hints to the community and he is mostly there but not yet :) anyway, I looked to your Debian activities, and you are really a good and prominent Maintainer, let me know if you want to do the great jump, I can start looking deeply at your work and sponsor your packages :) cheers, G.
Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2015, 18:41 +0100 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > thanks for the fix, Thanks very much to both of you. I created now a github fork for it: https://github.com/fezie/duperemove Though I didn't do much yet. > > (please finish your NM process! we need you :p ) Thanks again very much. You can't imagine how good that feels to me :-) Regards Felix
Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
true story :) bad copy/paste, sorry! thanks for the fix, (please finish your NM process! we need you :p ) G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Mattia Rizzolo" Date:Wed, 14 Oct, 2015 at 19:21 Subject:Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP] On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:14:16PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) the first patch should be upstreamed > 2) the second one should be: > -PREFIX = /usr/local > +PREFIX ?= /usr > > this way you can upstream it too. > (please forward and add link inside the patches) well, to upstream that you need to do -PREFIX = /usr/local +PREFIX ?= /usr/local then you can set PREFIX in d/rules -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:14:16PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) the first patch should be upstreamed > 2) the second one should be: > -PREFIX = /usr/local > +PREFIX ?= /usr > > this way you can upstream it too. > (please forward and add link inside the patches) well, to upstream that you need to do -PREFIX = /usr/local +PREFIX ?= /usr/local then you can set PREFIX in d/rules -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
Another issue: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/duperemove/0.10-1/blhc cheers, G.
Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Felix, let's review. 1) the first patch should be upstreamed 2) the second one should be: -PREFIX = /usr/local +PREFIX ?= /usr this way you can upstream it too. (please forward and add link inside the patches) 3) copyright is outdated. xxhash.c: BSD (2 clause) xxhash.h: BSD (2 clause) also many copyrights are missing grep copyright . -Ri lists a lot of stuff the other stuff might look good. the package seems to be working. cheers, G.
Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
Hi, is there now anything missing for getting duperemove into Debian?
