sbcl *should* declare that it breaks cl-asdf strictly earlier than
2:3.1.5-1 (i.e. 2:3.1.4-1 and earlier), and not doing so is a
packaging bug.
The complete solution to your issue will come when asdf releases
3.1.5, which will happen today, hopefully.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •ReflectionCybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
In the age of the Internet ignorance is a choice.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Gijs Hillenius g...@hillenius.net wrote:
Package: sbcl
Version: 2:1.2.12-1
Followup-For: Bug #787909
It is suggested to remove cl-asdf, but that takes cl-swank
common-lisp-controller with it. And those are required by slime.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages sbcl depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-18
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
Versions of packages sbcl recommends:
ii binfmt-support 2.1.5-1
Versions of packages sbcl suggests:
pn sbcl-doc none
pn sbcl-source none
ii slime2:2.13-1
-- no debconf information
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
