Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-11-03 Thread Mehdi 

Hi,

On 11/02/2015 10:14 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

On 02/11/15 10:03, Andreas Beckmann wrote:

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
 wrote:

ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages


With the ocaml transition finished in sid+testing, someone should take
care of the ocaml packages in experimental, since these needs binNMUs, too.

Affected source packages, ordered by the dependency levels from the
permanent tracker for sid, not checked further:

menhir (4)
cudf (6)
coq (7)
libaio-ocaml (not in sid)


Mehdi, can you look at that?



I'll take care of that. Sorry for the late reply.

Regards,

--
Mehdi

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-11-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 02/11/15 10:03, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>  wrote:
>> ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages
> 
> With the ocaml transition finished in sid+testing, someone should take
> care of the ocaml packages in experimental, since these needs binNMUs, too.
> 
> Affected source packages, ordered by the dependency levels from the
> permanent tracker for sid, not checked further:
> 
> menhir (4)
> cudf (6)
> coq (7)
> libaio-ocaml (not in sid)

Mehdi, can you look at that?

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-11-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
 wrote:
> ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages

With the ocaml transition finished in sid+testing, someone should take
care of the ocaml packages in experimental, since these needs binNMUs, too.

Affected source packages, ordered by the dependency levels from the
permanent tracker for sid, not checked further:

menhir (4)
cudf (6)
coq (7)
libaio-ocaml (not in sid)


Andreas

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-10-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 05/10/15 10:39, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 30/09/2015 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
>>
>> Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an 
>> update?
> 
> plplot has been removed from testing. No other improvements, but I
> believe we can proceed with the transition. Blocking packages are few
> (only 2 not maintained by Debian OCaml Maintainers, virt-top and
> zeroinstall-injector) and I think they can be (temporarily) removed from
> testing if needed.

Well it looks like #789354 (dose3) has been fixed.

Is ocaml-gettext still buggy? I just checked and there's a new version in the
archive, 0.3.5-2, with a CHANGELOG entry that seems to suggest this is fixed:

v 0.3.5 (Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:31:41 +0200):
  * Always use format_of_string to not segfault with OCaml 4.02.

If that's the case, then libguestfs (which has rdeps) and virt-top wouldn't need
to be removed.

monotone-viz also seems fixed.

Looks like zeroinstall-injector is the only package not maintained by the ocaml
team which is still buggy.

It'd have been easier if you had told me all that :)

Things look fine, so let's go ahead with this.

BTW please avoid binNMU'ing scilab until it migrates.

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-10-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu 
Le 30/09/2015 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
> 
> Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update?

plplot has been removed from testing. No other improvements, but I
believe we can proceed with the transition. Blocking packages are few
(only 2 not maintained by Debian OCaml Maintainers, virt-top and
zeroinstall-injector) and I think they can be (temporarily) removed from
testing if needed.

Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-09-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 07/09/15 17:45, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?

Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update?

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-09-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu 
Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane