Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
The whole point of this transition is that the rebuilt library is not compatible. So it can't provide the old name and there can't be a transitional package. Cheers Julien On August 9, 2015 8:25:46 AM CEST, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi Julien, I applied your patch and I updated some symbols. However, I added a binary libafflib0 as transitional package to avoid break some packages. Is there any problem in doing that? I attached a debdiff between afflib-3.7.6-4 and 3.7.6-5. Thanks a lot in advance. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-06 19:14 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br: Hi Julien, Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will wait 2 days to fix some symbols for ports. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-06 18:08 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5? Yes, something like the patch below. ... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to libafflib0v5 instead of libafflib0; sorry about that. Cheers, Julien -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
Sorry. You are right. I looked at each dependant package and no need notify the maintainers. Upload to unstable, closing the bug. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-09 15:43 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br: Hum... I understand but I prefer notify the maintainers. Thanks Julien! Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-09 14:01 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:42:29 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hi Julien, Ok. I will do it: 1. Upload to experimental, without close the bug. 2. Notify all maintainers of dependent packages, allowing changes up to next Saturday. 3. In next Saturday, upload to unstable, closing the bug. 4. Notify all maintainers that uploaded their packages to experimental. 5. File bugs (FTBFS) against all dependent packages not updated in experimental. Thanks a lot for your help. I don't think that delay is necessary, uploading to sid right away should be just fine, we'll rebuild reverse dependencies as needed. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
Hum... I understand but I prefer notify the maintainers. Thanks Julien! Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-09 14:01 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:42:29 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hi Julien, Ok. I will do it: 1. Upload to experimental, without close the bug. 2. Notify all maintainers of dependent packages, allowing changes up to next Saturday. 3. In next Saturday, upload to unstable, closing the bug. 4. Notify all maintainers that uploaded their packages to experimental. 5. File bugs (FTBFS) against all dependent packages not updated in experimental. Thanks a lot for your help. I don't think that delay is necessary, uploading to sid right away should be just fine, we'll rebuild reverse dependencies as needed. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
Hi Julien, Ok. I will do it: 1. Upload to experimental, without close the bug. 2. Notify all maintainers of dependent packages, allowing changes up to next Saturday. 3. In next Saturday, upload to unstable, closing the bug. 4. Notify all maintainers that uploaded their packages to experimental. 5. File bugs (FTBFS) against all dependent packages not updated in experimental. Thanks a lot for your help. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-09 8:50 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jul...@cristau.org: The whole point of this transition is that the rebuilt library is not compatible. So it can't provide the old name and there can't be a transitional package. Cheers Julien On August 9, 2015 8:25:46 AM CEST, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi Julien, I applied your patch and I updated some symbols. However, I added a binary libafflib0 as transitional package to avoid break some packages. Is there any problem in doing that? I attached a debdiff between afflib-3.7.6-4 and 3.7.6-5. Thanks a lot in advance. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-06 19:14 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br: Hi Julien, Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will wait 2 days to fix some symbols for ports. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-06 18:08 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5? Yes, something like the patch below. ... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to libafflib0v5 instead of libafflib0; sorry about that. Cheers, Julien -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:42:29 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hi Julien, Ok. I will do it: 1. Upload to experimental, without close the bug. 2. Notify all maintainers of dependent packages, allowing changes up to next Saturday. 3. In next Saturday, upload to unstable, closing the bug. 4. Notify all maintainers that uploaded their packages to experimental. 5. File bugs (FTBFS) against all dependent packages not updated in experimental. Thanks a lot for your help. I don't think that delay is necessary, uploading to sid right away should be just fine, we'll rebuild reverse dependencies as needed. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
Control: reopen -1 On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 19:33:49 +, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: afflib (3.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Upload to unstable. * Updated all symbols. (Closes: #790975) No, that's not how it works. You need to rename the binary package. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5? Yes, something like the patch below. ... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to libafflib0v5 instead of libafflib0; sorry about that. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5? Thanks! Eriberto 2015-08-06 17:18 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: Control: reopen -1 On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 19:33:49 +, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: afflib (3.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Upload to unstable. * Updated all symbols. (Closes: #790975) No, that's not how it works. You need to rename the binary package. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#790975: fixed in afflib 3.7.6-4
Hi Julien, Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will wait 2 days to fix some symbols for ports. Regards, Eriberto 2015-08-06 18:08 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5? Yes, something like the patch below. ... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to libafflib0v5 instead of libafflib0; sorry about that. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
