Bug#798111: Illegal instruction after compiling some code
Another case might be AFL: https://bugs.debian.org/841474 afl: FTBFS on armhf (illegal instruction on test-instr.c) DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
Bug#798111: Illegal instruction after compiling some code
tag 798111 moreinfo thanks Le 05/09/2015 à 20:55, Julien Puydt a écrit : Package: clang-3.8 Version: 1:3.8.0~svn245286-1 I tried to compile flint 2.5.2 (http://flintlib.org -- or the orig sources of experimental's flint package) with this version of clang to check if a problem I had with gcc 5 was compiler-related, but it gave me other problems : it compiled the lib and some tests ok, but when trying to actually run those tests, I had failures "Illegal instruction". Using clang version 3.5.2-2 (tags/RELEASE_352/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.2) gave the same result, but I prefer reporting on the last version. I configured the sources like this: CC=clang-3.8 ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-ntl CFLAGS='-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security' Sorry but I will need more information to be able to anything here... A test case would be the best. Thanks S
Bug#798111: Illegal instruction after compiling some code
Package: clang-3.8 Version: 1:3.8.0~svn245286-1 I tried to compile flint 2.5.2 (http://flintlib.org -- or the orig sources of experimental's flint package) with this version of clang to check if a problem I had with gcc 5 was compiler-related, but it gave me other problems : it compiled the lib and some tests ok, but when trying to actually run those tests, I had failures "Illegal instruction". Using clang version 3.5.2-2 (tags/RELEASE_352/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.2) gave the same result, but I prefer reporting on the last version. I configured the sources like this: CC=clang-3.8 ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-ntl CFLAGS='-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security' I hope it helps, Snark on #debian-science