Bug#798672: qdox: please upgrade qdox to version 2.x
On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:27:35 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch > > I have pushed the new release to Git master. I took the opportunity to > make some major cleanups and I switched to Maven and maven-debian-helper. > > I have tested a few reverse-dependencies and quickly realized that > probably all would need an update as well. The main reason is that the > class JavaDocBuilder was replaced by JavaProjectBuilder. :( FTR: It seems Fedora already completed this transition and I have found patches e.g. [1] for some of qdox r-deps. So probably it's not as bad as it looks Markus [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xbean.git/tree/0003-Port-to-QDox-2.0.patch signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#798672: qdox: please upgrade qdox to version 2.x
Control: tags -1 patch I have pushed the new release to Git master. I took the opportunity to make some major cleanups and I switched to Maven and maven-debian-helper. I have tested a few reverse-dependencies and quickly realized that probably all would need an update as well. The main reason is that the class JavaDocBuilder was replaced by JavaProjectBuilder. :( At least these packages would FTBFS when we uploaded qdox 2.0-M3-1 to unstable: libcommons-attributes-java groovy2 libjibx1.1-java fop maven-stapler-plugin Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#798672: qdox: please upgrade qdox to version 2.x
owner 798672 ! thanks I'm working on an update of qdox to version 2.0-M3. Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#798672: qdox: please upgrade qdox to version 2.x
Source: qdox Version: 1.12.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, while I was working on an update of paranamer, I discovered that this would require an update of qdox as well. We need the latest upstream release https://github.com/codehaus/qdox/releases/tag/qdox-2.0-M3 I am filing this bug report as a reminder and blocking bug. Markus