Bug#801951: debian/copyright should mention BSD3 license, not PSF
Am 11.07.21 um 01:28 schrieb Colin Watson: Thanks for committing a fix for this to git. Do you need sponsorship help to upload this (if so, I'd be happy to do it), or is an upload already in progress? The change needs sponsorship. It is in the Python Team's RFS queue, so please go ahead.
Bug#801951: debian/copyright should mention BSD3 license, not PSF
Control: tag -1 pending On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:05:05PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:48:28 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > debian/copyright currently refers to (various incarnations of...) the PSF > > license, whereas python-dateutil has been relicense under BSD3 a while ago. > > See http://sources.debian.net/src/python-dateutil/latest/LICENSE/ for > > reference. debian/copyright should be updated (and can be widely simplified > > / > > shortened) to refer to BSD3. > > Current versions (in buster and upcoming bullseye) are dual-licensed under > BSD3 and Apache 2. I am raising the severity because this is a long-standing > policy violation. Thanks for committing a fix for this to git. Do you need sponsorship help to upload this (if so, I'd be happy to do it), or is an upload already in progress? -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
Bug#801951: debian/copyright should mention BSD3 license, not PSF
Control: severity -1 serious Control: retitle -1 d/copyright must contain BSD3 and Apache 2, not PSF On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:48:28 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Package: python3-dateutil Version: 2.2-2 Severity: important debian/copyright currently refers to (various incarnations of...) the PSF license, whereas python-dateutil has been relicense under BSD3 a while ago. See http://sources.debian.net/src/python-dateutil/latest/LICENSE/ for reference. debian/copyright should be updated (and can be widely simplified / shortened) to refer to BSD3. Thanks a lot for maintaining python-dateutil in Debian, it's much appreciated! Cheers. Current versions (in buster and upcoming bullseye) are dual-licensed under BSD3 and Apache 2. I am raising the severity because this is a long-standing policy violation.
Bug#801951: debian/copyright should mention BSD3 license, not PSF
Package: python3-dateutil Version: 2.2-2 Severity: important debian/copyright currently refers to (various incarnations of...) the PSF license, whereas python-dateutil has been relicense under BSD3 a while ago. See http://sources.debian.net/src/python-dateutil/latest/LICENSE/ for reference. debian/copyright should be updated (and can be widely simplified / shortened) to refer to BSD3. Thanks a lot for maintaining python-dateutil in Debian, it's much appreciated! Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages python3-dateutil depends on: ii python3-six 1.10.0-1 pn python3:any ii tzdata 2015g-1 python3-dateutil recommends no packages. python3-dateutil suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
