Bug#820220: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf

[Graham Inggs]

Hi Peter

On 19 April 2016 at 21:17, Peter Colberg  wrote:
> julia 0.4.5-3 FTBFS on armel due to an outdated llvm-3.8 package:

Yes, suihkulokki pointed this out previously.

I requested removal of the armel binaries in bug #820713, and that
already has been processed.
Since the 0.4.5-3 upload, the package builds again on armhf.  At the
moment there is nothing blocking testing migration, it should happen
in the next few days.

> I think it would be a good idea to retain the version constraint
> llvm-3.8-dev (>= 1:3.8~+rc1) that was dropped in commit 17796f1.

I don't think this is necessary.  Since the armel binaries have been
removed, consecutive armel build failures will not block migration.

Regards
Graham

Bug#820220: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf

[Graham Inggs]

On 6 April 2016 at 20:31, Peter Colberg  wrote:
> Graham, should we remove these two archs from testing for the time
> being as you suggested?

I managed to get it building on armhf again in Ubuntu with a minor
change [1] and I have tested that it builds on a Debian armhf
porterbox.  I'll upload this to Debian soon, after the new openlibm
has built.

I don't think this will help with armel though.


[1] 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/251298934/julia_0.4.5-1_0.4.5-1ubuntu1.diff.gz