Bug#822203: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#822203: bitcoin-qt: New upstream release (0.12.1)

2016-08-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:21:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:35:42AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Anthony Towns (2016-08-01 06:25:25)
> > > I've had a go at packaging 0.12.1, and it seems to have worked. 
> > > Changes versus the collab-maint repo are at:
> > >   https://github.com/ajtowns/bitcoin-deb/commits/master
> > Attached script (in active use with asterisk package), placed in debian 
> > dir and executed from the root dir (just like a rules file) should do 
> > the trick of tracking copyright and licensing changes separate from 
> > Debian packaging.
> I had to pull debian/rules.copyright-check out of the asterisk source
> from sid, but apart from that it worked!
> I've added a few more commits at the repo above (namely, adding
> copyright-check, updating the copyright file, and adding zmq as a dep).

Oops; I noticed that I messed up the "gbp import-orig" (it wasn't synced
with the upstream branch), so I've redone it and rebased the repo above.

FWIW, 0.13.0rc2 seems to build okay too.

Cheers,
aj



Bug#822203: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#822203: bitcoin-qt: New upstream release (0.12.1)

2016-08-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:35:42AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Anthony Towns (2016-08-01 06:25:25)
> > I've had a go at packaging 0.12.1, and it seems to have worked. 
> > Changes versus the collab-maint repo are at:
> >   https://github.com/ajtowns/bitcoin-deb/commits/master
> Attached script (in active use with asterisk package), placed in debian 
> dir and executed from the root dir (just like a rules file) should do 
> the trick of tracking copyright and licensing changes separate from 
> Debian packaging.

I had to pull debian/rules.copyright-check out of the asterisk source
from sid, but apart from that it worked!

I've added a few more commits at the repo above (namely, adding
copyright-check, updating the copyright file, and adding zmq as a dep).

Cheers,
aj



Bug#822203: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#822203: bitcoin-qt: New upstream release (0.12.1)

2016-08-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Anthony Towns (2016-08-01 06:25:25)
> I've had a go at packaging 0.12.1, and it seems to have worked. 
> Changes versus the collab-maint repo are at:
> 
>   https://github.com/ajtowns/bitcoin-deb/commits/master
> 
> I had to disable cdbs to get it to build; I hit the same problem 
> Petter saw in Bug#808969. AFAICT cdbs is just used for the license 
> checking so that's not a huge problem; I couldn't figure out a 
> reasonable way of doing the license checking without cdbs though. :-/

Attached script (in active use with asterisk package), placed in debian 
dir and executed from the root dir (just like a rules file) should do 
the trick of tracking copyright and licensing changes separate from 
Debian packaging.

I am working on moving the license-checking routines out of CDBS but 
will take some time still.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
#!/bin/sh

# fail if check fails
export DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1

# bootstrap if this is first ever copyright-check
test -f debian/copyright_hints | touch debian/copyright_hints

# these may both fail - we want its fallout for further analysis
debian/rules.copyright-check pre-build || true
debian/rules.copyright-check clean || true


signature.asc
Description: signature