Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:01:48PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Since 1.18.something dpkg can handle unpacking of 1.18.15, and since > dpkg 1.19.0 it also creates them. yes it was a issue back then but now > it's correctly handled, and dak accepts them since last week. More info in this ftp.debian.org's bug: https://bugs.debian.org/888448 -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:45:56AM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 823190 + pending > thanks > > Fixed in Git, pending upload: Errr, no. Since 1.18.something dpkg can handle unpacking of 1.18.15, and since dpkg 1.19.0 it also creates them. yes it was a issue back then but now it's correctly handled, and dak accepts them since last week. > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=2f1efb44994b066c22a985c09a853fc9583aacf8 Please revert this commit and close this bug as no action needed anymore. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
tags 823190 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=2f1efb44994b066c22a985c09a853fc9583aacf8 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
Hi Guillem, > […] Thanks for the explanation :) > The report would still make sense for anything targetting a stable > release though, so it perhaps still has some merit? I'll leave the question of closing it up to you but I'll at least bump this bug down my own "priority" list. Thanks again. o/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > But at this point I'm not sure if the report makes sense anymore, as > I might as well enable signatures for format 1.0, given that stable > supports unpacking those now. Thanks for the "accidental" reminder. :) Except that IIRC the problem was about ftp-master, that TTBOMK is still not updated to stretch. You probably should check with ftp-masters/DSA before proposing such change again. Or wait another release to have the support propagate even further (as at that point only uploads targeting oldstable and LTS would matter). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
Hi! On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 23:00:44 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > It would be nice if lintian could error out when finding an orig > > tarball signature on source format 1.0 packages. > > > > The pattern for the signature is «.orig.tar.gz.asc». > > Where are these files stored? Am I confusing this with > debian/upstream-signing-key.asc … ? They are part of the source package, referenced by the .dsc. You can see existing instances of this in the archive, such as: $ apt-cache showsrc libbsd | grep '\.asc$' But at this point I'm not sure if the report makes sense anymore, as I might as well enable signatures for format 1.0, given that stable supports unpacking those now. Thanks for the "accidental" reminder. :) The report would still make sense for anything targetting a stable release though, so it perhaps still has some merit? Otherwise it can be closed. Thanks, Guillem
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
Hi Guillem, > It would be nice if lintian could error out when finding an orig > tarball signature on source format 1.0 packages. > > The pattern for the signature is «.orig.tar.gz.asc». Where are these files stored? Am I confusing this with debian/upstream-signing-key.asc … ? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.44 Severity: wishlist Hi! With dpkg 1.18.5, orig tarball signatures for format 1.0 will be accepted for extraction and building, which means stable systems will not be able to extract them. Extraction of orig taball signatures for format >= 2.0 have been accepted since dpkg 1.17.20, so these are safe to use. It would be nice if lintian could error out when finding an orig tarball signature on source format 1.0 packages. The pattern for the signature is «.orig.tar.gz.asc». Thanks, Guillem