Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]
Hi, >Isn't I'm supposed to raise the version number? or is "+nmu1" enough? I'm not sure, but in fact dch --nmu is not raising it, so I guess 1.8.2+nmu1 is fine, so the maintainer can still bump and release an NMU acknowledge called 1.8.3 >It part of the fix, but not needed to fix #818540 (as I understand). not a problem >No file attached here? You talking about this file correct? >https://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.2ubuntu1.patch yes >I did as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818540#39 >suggested, do you disagree with that solution? Is the original solution >preferred? it is fine, I just want to know your opinion. >Just pushed to mentors. seems still not working completely... this is what I get on a clean pbuilder environment ERROR: failed to retrieve status information from google : W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by key 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1) W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by key 3B068FB4789ABE4AEFA3BB491397BC53640DB551 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1) the ubuntu version prints the warning but starts the download anyway. what do you think about? G. > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:41:25 + > From: locutusofb...@debian.org > To: klausenb...@hotmail.com; ba...@debian.org; 824...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU] > > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > Hi, some questions about versioning and changelog: > > 1) why 1.8.3+nmu1 and not 1.8.2+nmu1? > 2) why UNRELEASED? please set unstable > > "* Validate deb file with sha256sum." <-- isn't this part of the fix for bug > #818540? > > the other stuff LGTM, I hope to sponsor it soon :) > > BTW did you see the ubuntu diff? > you might want to take some bits > > (attaching the debdiff between debian and ubuntu, I'm not talking about > fields like changelog entries > and maintainer field, more about the update script) > > thanks! > > G. > > > Il Venerdì 13 Maggio 2016 15:39, Kristian Klausen <klausenb...@hotmail.com> > ha scritto: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pepperflashplugin-nonfree": > > * Package name : pepperflashplugin-nonfree > Version : 1.8.3+nmu1 > Upstream Author : Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> > * URL : http://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer > * License : GPL3 > Section : Browser plugin > > It builds those binary packages: > > pepperflashplugin-nonfree > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/pepperflashplugin-nonfree > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.3+nmu1.dsc > > > Changes since the last upload: > > pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.3+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Update Google public key. Closes: #823005. > * Remove 32 bit support. Closes: #816848. > * Don't treat `apt-get update` warnings as errors. Closes: #818540. > * Validate deb file with sha256sum. > > -- Kristian Klausen <klausenb...@hotmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 14:44:52 +0200 > > > Regards, > Kristian Klausen
Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]
Hi again G :) > 1) why 1.8.3+nmu1 and not 1.8.2+nmu1? Isn't I'm supposed to raise the version number? or is "+nmu1" enough? > 2) why UNRELEASED? please set unstable I didn't noticed it. > "* Validate deb file with sha256sum." <-- isn't this part of the fix for bug > #818540? It part of the fix, but not needed to fix #818540 (as I understand). > (attaching the debdiff between debian and ubuntu, I'm not talking about > fields like changelog entries No file attached here? You talking about this file correct? https://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.2ubuntu1.patch I did as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818540#39 suggested, do you disagree with that solution? Is the original solution preferred? Just pushed to mentors. - Kristian > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:41:25 + > From: locutusofb...@debian.org > To: klausenb...@hotmail.com; ba...@debian.org; 824...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU] > > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > Hi, some questions about versioning and changelog: > > 1) why 1.8.3+nmu1 and not 1.8.2+nmu1? > 2) why UNRELEASED? please set unstable > > "* Validate deb file with sha256sum." <-- isn't this part of the fix for bug > #818540? > > the other stuff LGTM, I hope to sponsor it soon :) > > BTW did you see the ubuntu diff? > you might want to take some bits > > (attaching the debdiff between debian and ubuntu, I'm not talking about > fields like changelog entries > and maintainer field, more about the update script) > > thanks! > > G. > > > Il Venerdì 13 Maggio 2016 15:39, Kristian Klausen <klausenb...@hotmail.com> > ha scritto: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pepperflashplugin-nonfree": > > * Package name : pepperflashplugin-nonfree > Version : 1.8.3+nmu1 > Upstream Author : Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> > * URL : http://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer > * License : GPL3 > Section : Browser plugin > > It builds those binary packages: > > pepperflashplugin-nonfree > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/pepperflashplugin-nonfree > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.3+nmu1.dsc > > > Changes since the last upload: > > pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.3+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Update Google public key. Closes: #823005. > * Remove 32 bit support. Closes: #816848. > * Don't treat `apt-get update` warnings as errors. Closes: #818540. > * Validate deb file with sha256sum. > > -- Kristian Klausen <klausenb...@hotmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 14:44:52 +0200 > > > Regards, > Kristian Klausen
Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, some questions about versioning and changelog: 1) why 1.8.3+nmu1 and not 1.8.2+nmu1? 2) why UNRELEASED? please set unstable "* Validate deb file with sha256sum." <-- isn't this part of the fix for bug #818540? the other stuff LGTM, I hope to sponsor it soon :) BTW did you see the ubuntu diff? you might want to take some bits (attaching the debdiff between debian and ubuntu, I'm not talking about fields like changelog entries and maintainer field, more about the update script) thanks! G. Il Venerdì 13 Maggio 2016 15:39, Kristian Klausenha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pepperflashplugin-nonfree": * Package name: pepperflashplugin-nonfree Version : 1.8.3+nmu1 Upstream Author : Bart Martens * URL : http://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer * License : GPL3 Section : Browser plugin It builds those binary packages: pepperflashplugin-nonfree To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pepperflashplugin-nonfree Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.3+nmu1.dsc Changes since the last upload: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.3+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Update Google public key. Closes: #823005. * Remove 32 bit support. Closes: #816848. * Don't treat `apt-get update` warnings as errors. Closes: #818540. * Validate deb file with sha256sum. -- Kristian Klausen Fri, 13 May 2016 14:44:52 +0200 Regards, Kristian Klausen
Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pepperflashplugin-nonfree": * Package name : pepperflashplugin-nonfree Version : 1.8.3+nmu1 Upstream Author : Bart Martens* URL : http://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer * License : GPL3 Section : Browser plugin It builds those binary packages: pepperflashplugin-nonfree To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pepperflashplugin-nonfree Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.3+nmu1.dsc Changes since the last upload: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.3+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Update Google public key. Closes: #823005. * Remove 32 bit support. Closes: #816848. * Don't treat `apt-get update` warnings as errors. Closes: #818540. * Validate deb file with sha256sum. -- Kristian Klausen Fri, 13 May 2016 14:44:52 +0200 Regards, Kristian Klausen