Bug#825970: pypy: Please package pypy3 as well now

2018-08-26 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Jeroen (2018.07.26_12:46:39_+0100)
> > Python2 is dying. Is there any reason so that pypy3 shouldn't be
> > compiled and uploaded? If you lack time and need help, please just ask.

It's mostly been time, yes.

> I'd also like to see pypy3 packaged. Is there already any work done on
> packaging pypy3? If not then we should probably start with creating a
> pypy3 source package based on the pypy2 packaging.

I've had something mostly ready to go for a year or so :/

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pypy3

amd64 builds: https://people.debian.org/~stefanor/pypy3/
(which I'll update with 6.0.0, shortly)

The remaining issue that I know of, is figuring out a plan for
byte-compilation. I'll bring it up on the debian-python list...

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272



Bug#825970: pypy: Please package pypy3 as well now

2018-07-26 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:38:31 +0200,
Lumin wrote:
> Python2 is dying. Is there any reason so that pypy3 shouldn't be
> compiled and uploaded? If you lack time and need help, please just ask.

I'd also like to see pypy3 packaged. Is there already any work done on
packaging pypy3? If not then we should probably start with creating a
pypy3 source package based on the pypy2 packaging.



Bug#825970: pypy: Please package pypy3 as well now

2018-07-11 Thread Lumin
Hi Stefano,

Python2 is dying. Is there any reason so that pypy3 shouldn't be
compiled and uploaded? If you lack time and need help, please just ask.



Bug#825970: pypy: Please package pypy3 as well now

2018-04-28 Thread Yuri D'Elia

Package: pypy
Version: 6.0.0+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #825970

pypy 6 is officially a dual 2.7/3.5 release.

It would be very nice to have a pypy3 package. I have to keep a custom build,
since I no longer develop on 2.7 since quite some time now.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
 APT prefers unstable
 APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages pypy depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.19.0.5.0~reproducible1
ii  libbz2-1.01.0.6-8.1
ii  libc6 2.27-3
ii  libexpat1 2.2.5-3
ii  libffi6   3.2.1-8
ii  libgcc1   1:8-20180425-1
ii  libgdbm5  1.14.1-6
ii  libncurses6   6.1+20180210-2
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.23.1-1
ii  libssl1.1 1.1.0h-2
ii  libtinfo6 6.1+20180210-2
ii  pypy-lib  6.0.0+dfsg-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

pypy recommends no packages.

Versions of packages pypy suggests:
ii  pypy-doc  6.0.0+dfsg-1
pn  pypy-tk   



Bug#825970: pypy: Please package pypy3 as well now

2017-10-19 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Package: pypy
Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-4
Followup-For: Bug #825970

Any progress / requests for help / things we can do?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (650, 'oldstable'), (600, 'unstable'), (550, 
'experimental'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages pypy depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.18.24
ii  libbz2-1.01.0.6-8.1
ii  libc6 2.24-11+deb9u1
ii  libexpat1 2.2.0-2+deb9u1
ii  libffi6   3.2.1-6
ii  libgdbm3  1.8.3-14
ii  libncurses5   6.0+20161126-1
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.16.2-5
ii  libssl1.1 1.1.0f-3
ii  libtinfo5 6.0+20161126-1
ii  pypy-lib  5.6.0+dfsg-4
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-5

pypy recommends no packages.

Versions of packages pypy suggests:
pn  pypy-doc  
pn  pypy-tk   

-- no debconf information



Bug#825970: pypy: Please package pypy3 as well now

2016-05-31 Thread Ben Longbons
Package: pypy
Version: 5.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Yesterday, the first alpha of PyPy3 v5.2 (supporting 3.3) was released.

While the actual release is still some time off, now would be a good
time to start getting the infrastructure ready, either in experimental
or in unstable-with-a-blocking-bug (the latter might be more friendly
for packages that wish to release versions for both cpython and pypy).

Note that upstream pypy3 is released as a separate product (and
thus likely source package) despite being in the same repository.

PyPy3 v5.2 is now much more mature than the previous v2.4 release
(which was released shortly after the same-numbered PyPy2 release - the
whatsnew and release files for PyPy2 are much more thorough and generally
still applicable), and I've been using snapshots happily for a while.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (600, 'testing-debug'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 
'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages pypy depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.18.7
ii  libbz2-1.01.0.6-8
ii  libc6 2.22-9
ii  libexpat1 2.1.1-2
ii  libffi6   3.2.1-4
ii  libgdbm3  1.8.3-13.1
ii  libncurses5   6.0+20160319-1
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.13.0-1
ii  libssl1.0.2   1.0.2h-1
ii  libtinfo5 6.0+20160319-1
ii  pypy-lib  5.1.2+dfsg-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1

pypy recommends no packages.

Versions of packages pypy suggests:
ii  pypy-doc  5.1.2+dfsg-1
pn  pypy-tk   

-- no debconf information