Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-10-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 30/09/16 03:08, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu pcp_3.11.5 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against perl 5.24."
> 
> maintainer upload built against 5.22 during the transition ...

Scheduled.

Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
nmu pcp_3.11.5 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against perl 5.24."

maintainer upload built against 5.22 during the transition ...


Andreas

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 26/09/16 02:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> binNMU candidates for experimental:
> 
> courier_0.76.2-1
> nginx_1.11.3-1~exp2
> libatteanx-store-memorytriplestore-perl_0.001~20150811-1
> imagemagick_8:6.9.5.9+dfsg-1

Scheduled.

> but you probably don't want that one:
> 
> linux_4.8~rc5-1~exp1

That got a new upload.

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann 
binNMU candidates for experimental:

courier_0.76.2-1
nginx_1.11.3-1~exp2
libatteanx-store-memorytriplestore-perl_0.001~20150811-1
imagemagick_8:6.9.5.9+dfsg-1

but you probably don't want that one:

linux_4.8~rc5-1~exp1


Andreas

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 23/09/16 12:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/09/16 11:40, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
 Control: tags -1 confirmed

 Hi Dom!

 On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
>
>> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
>> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the 
>> blocker
>> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
>> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
>> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
>>
>> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
>> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
>> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
>> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
>> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky 
>> fix?
>> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
>> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed
>
> These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
> DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
> from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
> these issues.
>
> Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
> or do we need to wait for a better time?

 I wanted to get openmpi done, and that's happened today. So, let's start 
 this!

>>> It actually only almost happened.  So maybe hold this for a bit.
>>
>> Okay. Ready to upload when you say the word!
> 
> Britney crashed last night, but it just run and the openmpi issues are solved.
> Go ahead!

I have scheduled all the binNMUs. Unfortunately I didn't notice linux is a part
of this transition. Let's hope we can get all the perl side ready soon and that
linux gets fixed (it's got an RC bug atm) so stuff doesn't get blocked.

Regards,
Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
On 23/09/16 11:40, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> Hi Dom!
>>>
>>> On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.

> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the blocker
> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
>
> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky 
> fix?
> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed

 These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
 DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
 from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
 these issues.

 Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
 or do we need to wait for a better time?
>>>
>>> I wanted to get openmpi done, and that's happened today. So, let's start 
>>> this!
>>>
>> It actually only almost happened.  So maybe hold this for a bit.
> 
> Okay. Ready to upload when you say the word!

Britney crashed last night, but it just run and the openmpi issues are solved.
Go ahead!

Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-23 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > 
> > Hi Dom!
> > 
> > On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > >>> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
> > > 
> > >> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
> > >> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the 
> > >> blocker
> > >> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
> > >> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
> > >> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
> > >>
> > >> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
> > >> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
> > >> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> > >> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> > >> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky 
> > >> fix?
> > >> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
> > >> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed
> > > 
> > > These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
> > > DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
> > > from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
> > > these issues.
> > > 
> > > Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
> > > or do we need to wait for a better time?
> > 
> > I wanted to get openmpi done, and that's happened today. So, let's start 
> > this!
> > 
> It actually only almost happened.  So maybe hold this for a bit.

Okay. Ready to upload when you say the word!

Cheers,
Dominic.

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> Hi Dom!
> 
> On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> >>> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
> > 
> >> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
> >> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the blocker
> >> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
> >> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
> >> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
> >>
> >> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
> >> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
> >> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> >> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> >> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky 
> >> fix?
> >> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
> >> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed
> > 
> > These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
> > DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
> > from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
> > these issues.
> > 
> > Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
> > or do we need to wait for a better time?
> 
> I wanted to get openmpi done, and that's happened today. So, let's start this!
> 
It actually only almost happened.  So maybe hold this for a bit.

Cheers,
Julien

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
Control: tags -1 confirmed

Hi Dom!

On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
> 
>> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
>> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the blocker
>> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
>> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
>> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
>>
>> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
>> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
>> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
>> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
>> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky fix?
>> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
>> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed
> 
> These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
> DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
> from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
> these issues.
> 
> Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
> or do we need to wait for a better time?

I wanted to get openmpi done, and that's happened today. So, let's start this!

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-22 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:52:12PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:03:41PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > openbabel was ACCEPTED today but it failed to build 
> > 
> > - on mips:
> > "c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)"
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openbabel=mips=2.3.2%2Bdfsg-2.4=1474379322
> > 
> > - on mips64el:
> > "openbabel-perl.cpp:17073:86: internal compiler error: in 
> > df_reg_chain_unlink, at df-scan.c:790"
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openbabel=mips64el=2.3.2%2Bdfsg-2.4=1474385515
> 
> Thanks for noticing. I've filed #838394 (just one for starters) about
> this and will see if it's reproducible on the porter boxes.

The buildd rebuilds succeeded, so I suppose this issue doesn't need to
block the transition any more.

Cheers,
Dominic.

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-20 Thread Niko Tyni 
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:03:41PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:52:21 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> 
> > > #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
> > 
> > These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
> > DELAYED at the moment) and 
> 
> openbabel was ACCEPTED today but it failed to build 
> 
> - on mips:
> "c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)"
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openbabel=mips=2.3.2%2Bdfsg-2.4=1474379322
> 
> - on mips64el:
> "openbabel-perl.cpp:17073:86: internal compiler error: in 
> df_reg_chain_unlink, at df-scan.c:790"
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openbabel=mips64el=2.3.2%2Bdfsg-2.4=1474385515

Thanks for noticing. I've filed #838394 (just one for starters) about
this and will see if it's reproducible on the porter boxes.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-20 Thread gregor herrmann 
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:52:21 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:

> > #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
> 
> These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
> DELAYED at the moment) and 

openbabel was ACCEPTED today but it failed to build 

- on mips:
"c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)"
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openbabel=mips=2.3.2%2Bdfsg-2.4=1474379322

- on mips64el:
"openbabel-perl.cpp:17073:86: internal compiler error: in df_reg_chain_unlink, 
at df-scan.c:790"
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openbabel=mips64el=2.3.2%2Bdfsg-2.4=1474385515



Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer -  https://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: lorry box/Tontauben: enemy


signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-19 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.

> I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
> There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the blocker
> list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
> with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
> which has popped up only on ppc64el.
> 
> #825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
> #834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
> #825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> #825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
> #837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky fix?
> #825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
> #834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed

These are nearly all sorted now - just openbabel to hit sid (in
DELAYED at the moment) and the other three blockers to be removed
from testing when the time comes. Thanks as ever to those who worked on
these issues.

Release team, are we in a position to upload in the next day or two
or do we need to wait for a better time?

Thanks,
Dominic.

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-14 Thread Dominic Hargreaves 
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
> 
> Packages have been in experimental since May, and we've been doing
> test rebuilds with those. Issues are tracked with the usertag
> debian-p...@lists.debian.org / perl-5.24-transition and can be seen at
> 
>  
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.24-transition;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> 
> The worst blockers are currently libdata-alias-perl (#825011) and net-snmp
> (#825014), and there are still a few other build failures with fewer
> reverse dependencies. I'll mark this bug as blocked by those soon.
> 
> There are no major packaging changes with 5.24, but this is the first
> time that the new libperl package (libperl5.24) is coinstallable with
> the older one (libperl5.22). Some upgrade testing is still needed,
> but we do not expect this to cause trouble.

I'd like to propose that we upload perl 5.24 to unstable next week.
There are a few things left to deal with and I've just updated the blocker
list. I think they can all be either fixed in a week or removed,
with the possible exception of graphicsmagick which was a new FTBFS
which has popped up only on ppc64el.

#825524: liblexical-underscore-perl - there is a patch available
#834249: openbabel - there is a patch available
#825012: libalgorithm-permute-perl - no rdeps, to remove
#825231: libdevel-beginlift-perl - no rdeps, to remove
#837719: graphicsmagick - new issue, may need to wait or push for hacky fix?
#825762: libtext-sprintfn-perl - fixed upstream
#834800: libkavorka-perl - one rdep libmoops-perl, both can be removed

There is also 

#825011: libdata-alias-perl

which we've agreed to be removed, and one non-blocking FTBFS with perl
5.24 bug open:

#825611: libparse-http-useragent-perl

I've also increased the severity of all FTBFS with perl 5.24 bugs
to serious (7 out of the above 9).

Thanks,
Dominic.

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-07-07 Thread Niko Tyni 
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:51:09PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.24.html
> 
> On 07/07/16 12:55, Niko Tyni wrote:

> OK. Please let us know when you think things are ready to start.

Sure, will do.

> > There are no major packaging changes with 5.24, but this is the first
> > time that the new libperl package (libperl5.24) is coinstallable with
> > the older one (libperl5.22). Some upgrade testing is still needed,
> > but we do not expect this to cause trouble.
> 
> Is that going to make a difference? Given modules depend on perlapi-*, which 
> is
> provided by perl-base, and so you can't co-install perlapi-5.22.x and
> perlapi-5.24.y.

Not much difference, but there are some packages linking just
against libperl without needing perlapi-*, usually to embed a Perl
interpreter. Examples include linux-perf-* and postgresql-plperl-*. The
libperl* version coinstallability makes it possible to keep old versions
of these around while upgrading the system perl.
-- 
Niko

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-07-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.24.html

On 07/07/16 12:55, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.
> 
> Packages have been in experimental since May, and we've been doing
> test rebuilds with those. Issues are tracked with the usertag
> debian-p...@lists.debian.org / perl-5.24-transition and can be seen at
> 
>  
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.24-transition;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> 
> The worst blockers are currently libdata-alias-perl (#825011) and net-snmp
> (#825014), and there are still a few other build failures with fewer
> reverse dependencies. I'll mark this bug as blocked by those soon.

OK. Please let us know when you think things are ready to start.

> There are no major packaging changes with 5.24, but this is the first
> time that the new libperl package (libperl5.24) is coinstallable with
> the older one (libperl5.22). Some upgrade testing is still needed,
> but we do not expect this to cause trouble.

Is that going to make a difference? Given modules depend on perlapi-*, which is
provided by perl-base, and so you can't co-install perlapi-5.22.x and
perlapi-5.24.y.

> Greetings from DebConf16 in sunny Cape Town!

We haven't met yet! We should fix that :)

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-07-07 Thread Niko Tyni 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch.

Packages have been in experimental since May, and we've been doing
test rebuilds with those. Issues are tracked with the usertag
debian-p...@lists.debian.org / perl-5.24-transition and can be seen at

 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.24-transition;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org

The worst blockers are currently libdata-alias-perl (#825011) and net-snmp
(#825014), and there are still a few other build failures with fewer
reverse dependencies. I'll mark this bug as blocked by those soon.

There are no major packaging changes with 5.24, but this is the first
time that the new libperl package (libperl5.24) is coinstallable with
the older one (libperl5.22). Some upgrade testing is still needed,
but we do not expect this to cause trouble.

To make testing easier, we are making our rebuilt binary packages
available and updating them automatically when there are new sid
uploads. These rebuilt binary packages are compatible with perl_5.24.0-1
in experimental, and we do not expect any further ABI changes or the
like. Please see  for instructions, and note
that these should be only used on throwaway test systems.

Help with upgrade testing would be very welcome, hence copying the
debian-perl list. Greetings from DebConf16 in sunny Cape Town!

Ben file:

title = "perl";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libperl5.22" | .depends ~ /perlapi-5\.22\..*/ | 
.depends ~ "libperl5.24" | .depends ~ /perlapi-5\.24\..*/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libperl5.24" | .depends ~ /perlapi-5\.24\..*/;
is_bad = .depends ~ "libperl5.22" | .depends ~ /perlapi-5\.22\..*/;


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)