Bug#831844: [debian-mysql] Bug#831844: mysql-5.6: Multiple security fixes from the July 2016 CPU

2016-09-24 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hello!

2016-09-22 18:10 GMT+03:00 Dominic Hargreaves :
>
> As I need to have a MySQL 5.6 backport supported for the foreseeable
> future, I intend to NMU a new upstream release in the next few weeks.
>
> Does anyone have any objections to this?

I've accepted your Alioth join request.

So you only plan to upload to backports..? If you upload to unstable,
please note that the mysql-5.6 source is missing some important
packaging changes done in mysql-5.7 for Debian unstable (split to
mysql-defaults etc) and anyway uploading mysql-5.6 to unstable anymore
is not recommended, as mysql-5.7 is about to overtake it.

- Otto



Bug#831844: [debian-mysql] Bug#831844: mysql-5.6: Multiple security fixes from the July 2016 CPU

2016-09-24 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:26:33PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:10:37PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > Do you have any ETA for this update being in unstable?
> > 
> > I assume that there is no more work for mysql-5.6 planned by the
> > MySQL team, given the silence on this bug and that you are about to
> > upload mysql-5.7 (cf #837615).
> 
> That's right - I intend to fix the bug by uploading mysql-5.7 to
> unstable.
> 
> > As I need to have a MySQL 5.6 backport supported for the foreseeable
> > future, I intend to NMU a new upstream release in the next few weeks.
> > 
> > Does anyone have any objections to this?
> 
> 
> I'm happy for you to do this - please join the team! Perhaps you could
> maintain a backport branch in VCS with us?

I'm happy to maintain the backport in the team git repository. My
alioth username is 'dom'. However I am very unlikely to be able to
spend time on other MySQL packaging work in the forseeable future.

> I did see
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2016-September/009435.html
> scroll past, and didn't feel in a position to be able to help, because
> I've not looked at the backport at all. I believe there's a bug reported
> against the backports package too, though I'm not sure how to locate
> that easily right now.
> 
> So I suppose I only have one request, which is that if you want to
> continue to maintain the backport, that you please also watch and manage
> the ML and BTS for issues against those backported packages. Does that
> sound OK to you?

Bugs against backports should be reported to
debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org (which I am subscribed to), not
the BTS[1]. That user appears to have an odd mix of versions going on,
so this isn't really a bug in the backport, but rather mixing packages
from different sources.

That said I am happy to subscribe to the mailing list to watch out for
backports related issues.

Cheers,
Dominic.

[1] 



Bug#831844: [debian-mysql] Bug#831844: mysql-5.6: Multiple security fixes from the July 2016 CPU

2016-09-22 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Dominic,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:10:37PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > Do you have any ETA for this update being in unstable?
> 
> I assume that there is no more work for mysql-5.6 planned by the
> MySQL team, given the silence on this bug and that you are about to
> upload mysql-5.7 (cf #837615).

That's right - I intend to fix the bug by uploading mysql-5.7 to
unstable.

> As I need to have a MySQL 5.6 backport supported for the foreseeable
> future, I intend to NMU a new upstream release in the next few weeks.
> 
> Does anyone have any objections to this?


I'm happy for you to do this - please join the team! Perhaps you could
maintain a backport branch in VCS with us?

I did see
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2016-September/009435.html
scroll past, and didn't feel in a position to be able to help, because
I've not looked at the backport at all. I believe there's a bug reported
against the backports package too, though I'm not sure how to locate
that easily right now.

So I suppose I only have one request, which is that if you want to
continue to maintain the backport, that you please also watch and manage
the ML and BTS for issues against those backported packages. Does that
sound OK to you?

Robie