Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
Hi > We have 3 RC bugs on proftp. For two of them there is a fix in git. > For the third one I/we do not know how to solve it (tag "help" is set). > I'd rather upload a fix for all of these three, as the uploaded package > won't migrate to testing if the third is still present. > > I you disagree drop us a note. > please NMU the package. It is one of the last blockers for hardening-wrapper removals, the others are being uploaded right now. (note: I'm not maintainer, nor uploader for this package) thanks! G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
On 24.09.2016 11:29, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:25:07PM -0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: Hi Adrian, >> I have committed to proftpd-pkg git repository, >> I will upload to mentos once the other diff has completed. >> ... > > what is the status of fixing this Release Critical bug? > We have 3 RC bugs on proftp. For two of them there is a fix in git. For the third one I/we do not know how to solve it (tag "help" is set). I'd rather upload a fix for all of these three, as the uploaded package won't migrate to testing if the third is still present. I you disagree drop us a note. Hilmar -- http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ #206401 http://counter.li.org
Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:25:07PM -0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: >... > I have committed to proftpd-pkg git repository, > I will upload to mentos once the other diff has completed. >... Hi Mahyuddin, what is the status of fixing this Release Critical bug? Thanks Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
tags 831961 + pending thanks Hello Santiago Vila, and everyone else, I have committed to proftpd-pkg git repository, I will upload to mentos once the other diff has completed. On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > tags 831961 + patch > thanks > > The following patch should fix this bug. > > Thanks. > --- a/debian/rules > +++ b/debian/rules > @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ debian/control: debian/control.in > debian/proftpd-substvars: debian/proftpd-substvars.in > sed -e 's/@VERSION@/$(VERSION)/' $< >$@ > > +build-arch: build > +build-indep: build > build: debian/proftpd-substvars configure-stamp build-stamp > build-stamp: > dh_testdir > @@ -174,3 +176,4 @@ checkroot: > > .PHONY: binary binary-arch binary-indep clean checkroot myclean install > configure debian/proftpd-substvars debian/control > > +.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep > ___ > Pkg-proftpd-maintainers mailing list > pkg-proftpd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-proftpd-maintainers signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
tags 831961 + patch thanks The following patch should fix this bug. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ debian/control: debian/control.in debian/proftpd-substvars: debian/proftpd-substvars.in sed -e 's/@VERSION@/$(VERSION)/' $< >$@ +build-arch: build +build-indep: build build: debian/proftpd-substvars configure-stamp build-stamp build-stamp: dh_testdir @@ -174,3 +176,4 @@ checkroot: .PHONY: binary binary-arch binary-indep clean checkroot myclean install configure debian/proftpd-substvars debian/control +.PHONY: build build-arch build-indep
Bug#831961: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
Source: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.5a-1 Severity: important Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160720 qa-ftbfs qa-indep Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This rebuild was done by building only the architecture-independent packages. At the same time, a normal build succeeded, which points the problem specifically to build-indep/binary-indep targets. The specific error below usually happens when there is no build-indep target in debian/rules. If all the arch-independent packages are dummy transitional packages released with jessie, the easy fix is to drop them now. If not, debian/rules should be modified so that the build-indep and binary-indep target generates the architecture independent packages (and only those). After checking that both "dpkg-buildpackage -A" and "dpkg-buildpackage -B" work properly, this package will be suitable to be uploaded in source-only form if you wish. I file this bug as severity: important, but Santiago Vila, who led this effort (kudos to him), got approval from the release team to consider those bugs RC for stretch. The severity will be increased to 'serious' shortly. See #830997 for details. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build-indep > make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop. The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/07/20/proftpd-dfsg_1.3.5a-1_unstable_archallonly.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
