Bug#855966: qemu: Please use full version number (2.8.0 instead of 2.8)

2018-06-25 Thread Laurent Bigonville

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:21:41 +0300 Michael Tokarev  wrote:
> 24.02.2017 00:16, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > Source: qemu
> > Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2
> > Severity: low
> >
> > Could you please use the full version number 2.8.0 instead of 2.8?
>
> What's wrong with using just 2-component version number?
> We do apply the stable patchsets, and we do apply the selected
> stable patches. So the result is really not any 2.8.y patcheset,
> but something more than that.
>
> On the other hand, using full 3-components version number requires
> re-upload of the upstream source, and makes packaging to be more
> work than it is now.
>
> So what do we gain and what for?
>
> If it is only the watch file, that's so much minor non-issue,
> there's just no point in spending time with that.

I would also agree with using the same version number as the one 
released by upstream (ie 2.12.0 vs 2.12)


The tarball you are (or should) download is already coming with that 
version in the name


This is generally a good habit to stick with the version scheme upstream 
is using IMHO


Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville



Bug#855966: qemu: Please use full version number (2.8.0 instead of 2.8)

2017-02-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.02.2017 00:16, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Source: qemu
> Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2
> Severity: low
> 
> Could you please use the full version number 2.8.0 instead of 2.8?

What's wrong with using just 2-component version number?
We do apply the stable patchsets, and we do apply the selected
stable patches. So the result is really not any 2.8.y patcheset,
but something more than that.

On the other hand, using full 3-components version number requires
re-upload of the upstream source, and makes packaging to be more
work than it is now.

So what do we gain and what for?

If it is only the watch file, that's so much minor non-issue,
there's just no point in spending time with that.

Thanks,

/mjt



Bug#855966: qemu: Please use full version number (2.8.0 instead of 2.8)

2017-02-23 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: qemu
Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2
Severity: low

Could you please use the full version number 2.8.0 instead of 2.8?

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qemu complains that a newer upstream
version is available because that's what the watch file indicates.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha