Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
Control: tags -1 pending On 25/06/17 13:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> FTR: >>> >>> >From 2017-05-29: >>> >>> 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already >>> plan what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get >>> a ACK for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after >>> the release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;) >>> 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds. >>> 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - >>> https://bugs.debian.org/862189 >>> 12:39 < pochu> ack >>> 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :) >>> >>> So uploaded now. >>> >>> firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway. >>> >>> As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release >>> said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the >>> bin-NMU. >> >> binNMUs scheduled, excluding firefox (bd-uninst) firefox-esr (was waiting >> for it >> to migrate, I'll binNMU it at some point) and libreoffice. > > firefox-esr migrated, and now has a maintainer upload so hopefully won't > need a binNMU. It does not yet build though, because it depends on an > unavailable version of libsqlite (so we'll possibly need to transition that > when it happens, to unblock this one). > > Or we could do removals, but that feels a bit ew. Given hunspell already migrated to testing, this is not blocking anything, so there's no rush to get it finished. Thus there's no need to remove firefox-esr (plus any rdeps). This should just sort itself out in due time. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > FTR: > > > >>From 2017-05-29: > > > > 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already > > plan what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get > > a ACK for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after > > the release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;) > > 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds. > > 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - > > https://bugs.debian.org/862189 > > 12:39 < pochu> ack > > 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :) > > > > So uploaded now. > > > > firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway. > > > > As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release > > said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the > > bin-NMU. > > binNMUs scheduled, excluding firefox (bd-uninst) firefox-esr (was waiting for > it > to migrate, I'll binNMU it at some point) and libreoffice. firefox-esr migrated, and now has a maintainer upload so hopefully won't need a binNMU. It does not yet build though, because it depends on an unavailable version of libsqlite (so we'll possibly need to transition that when it happens, to unblock this one). Or we could do removals, but that feels a bit ew. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > FTR: > >>From 2017-05-29: > > 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already plan > what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get a ACK > for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after the > release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;) > 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds. > 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - > https://bugs.debian.org/862189 > 12:39 < pochu> ack > 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :) > > So uploaded now. > > firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway. > > As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release > said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the > bin-NMU. binNMUs scheduled, excluding firefox (bd-uninst) firefox-esr (was waiting for it to migrate, I'll binNMU it at some point) and libreoffice. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
Hi, FTR: >From 2017-05-29: 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already plan what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get a ACK for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after the release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;) 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds. 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - https://bugs.debian.org/862189 12:39 < pochu> ack 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :) So uploaded now. firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway. As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the bin-NMU. Regards, Rene
Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
Hi, On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 05:32:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Of the packages using hunspell, only lokalize failed (again, no surprise on > how they > do the detection), filed #862163. ... which is now fixed. Regards,
Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, Simply a "new" upstream. Ben file: title = "hunspell"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0" | .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.6-0"; is_good = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.6-0"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0"; (there's already a auto-hunspell tracker.) Note newer firefoxes (as in experimental) already seem to need >= 1.6... Of the packages using hunspell, only lokalize failed (again, no surprise on how they do the detection), filed #862163. Regards, Rene
