Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-08-02 Thread Bdale Garbee 
tags 862309 +pending
thanks

Michael Biebl  writes:

> the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist.

Thanks for catching this.  I didn't notice when the upstream Makefile
changed to deliver this by default.  Fixed in my revision control system
for the next upload.

Bdale


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-08-02 Thread Bdale Garbee 
Paul Wise  writes:

> it might be useful to install it as an example instead.

Sure, makes sense, and easy to do.

Bdale


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-06-01 Thread Bob Proulx 
Paul Wise wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
> > the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist.
> > Afaics, this is a sample file provided by upstream and I don't think
> > this should go into /etc
> 
> Agreed, but it might be useful to install it as an example instead.
> A sudoers example already exists, maybe it should be moved to
> sudoers.long and the upstream sample installed into sudoers?
> 
> /usr/share/doc/sudo/examples/sudoers.gz

Being a sample file then this should go into the /usr/share package
examples location above and not into /etc.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-05-31 Thread Paul Wise 
On Thu, 11 May 2017 03:41:46 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:

> the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist.
> Afaics, this is a sample file provided by upstream and I don't think
> this should go into /etc

Agreed, but it might be useful to install it as an example instead.
A sudoers example already exists, maybe it should be moved to
sudoers.long and the upstream sample installed into sudoers?

/usr/share/doc/sudo/examples/sudoers.gz

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-05-10 Thread Michael Biebl 
Package: sudo
Version: 1.8.20-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist.
Afaics, this is a sample file provided by upstream and I don't think
this should go into /etc, /etc/sudoers and our conffile mechanism is
sufficient.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages sudo depends on:
ii  libaudit1   1:2.6.7-2
ii  libc6   2.24-10
ii  libpam-modules  1.1.8-3.5
ii  libpam0g1.1.8-3.5
ii  libselinux1 2.6-3+b1
ii  lsb-base9.20161125

sudo recommends no packages.

sudo suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/sudoers [Errno 13] Keine Berechtigung: '/etc/sudoers'
/etc/sudoers.d/README [Errno 13] Keine Berechtigung: '/etc/sudoers.d/README'

-- no debconf information