Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-12-15 Thread Mike Gabriel

Hi,

On  Sa 15 Dez 2018 12:00:52 CET, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:


On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:52:09AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:

On  Sa 15 Dez 2018 10:35:07 CET, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

>Can you grant me write access then? Currently I'm not allowed to push
>to the repository.

Access granted now.


Thanks. I'll push the updates in the next days and inform you once I'm
done.



Ack. Thanks for helping out with NoDM packaging updates.

Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de



pgpWUkGm5VZDl.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-12-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Mike,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:52:09AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On  Sa 15 Dez 2018 10:35:07 CET, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 09:09:18AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >>On Saturday, 15 December 2018, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> >>> Hello Mike,
> >>> hello Ondřej,
> >>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> >>> > your package nodm has several unhandled debconf
> >>> > translations, some of then available for several months. I see that
> >>> > several uplaods have been made, is there a reason for not including
> >>> > those translations? Do you need help handling?
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm currently trying (also in preparation for the freeze) to resolve
> >>> > those pending translation. In December I will consider if a l10n NMU
> >>> > is appropriate (which I would rather avoid, a MU is much better and of
> >>> > course better integrated in your workflow).
> >>>
> >>> As I haven't got a reply, I will prepare a l10n NMU next week
> >>> considering #872178, #906170 and the lintian warning
> >>> priority-extra-is-replaced-by-priority-optional
> >>>
> >>> I also will look at #852125, the fix looks rather straightforward to
> >>> integrate.
> >>>
> >>> If you want to do a MU (preferred) let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Greetings
> >>>
> >>>  Helge
> >>
> >>Please push your changes to the packaging repo on
> >>salsa.debian.org/debian/nodm. I will do the maintainer upload once you
> >>ping me...
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Can you grant me write access then? Currently I'm not allowed to push
> >to the repository.
> 
> Access granted now.

Thanks. I'll push the updates in the next days and inform you once I'm
done.

Greetings

   Helge


-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-12-15 Thread Mike Gabriel

Hi Helge,

On  Sa 15 Dez 2018 10:35:07 CET, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:


Hello Mike,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 09:09:18AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:

On Saturday, 15 December 2018, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Mike,
> hello Ondřej,
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > your package nodm has several unhandled debconf
> > translations, some of then available for several months. I see that
> > several uplaods have been made, is there a reason for not including
> > those translations? Do you need help handling?
> >
> > I'm currently trying (also in preparation for the freeze) to resolve
> > those pending translation. In December I will consider if a l10n NMU
> > is appropriate (which I would rather avoid, a MU is much better and of
> > course better integrated in your workflow).
>
> As I haven't got a reply, I will prepare a l10n NMU next week
> considering #872178, #906170 and the lintian warning
> priority-extra-is-replaced-by-priority-optional
>
> I also will look at #852125, the fix looks rather straightforward to
> integrate.
>
> If you want to do a MU (preferred) let me know.
>
> Greetings
>
>  Helge

Please push your changes to the packaging repo on  
salsa.debian.org/debian/nodm. I will do the maintainer upload once  
you ping me...


Thanks.

Can you grant me write access then? Currently I'm not allowed to push
to the repository.


Access granted now.

Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148
landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139

GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22  0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de



pgpxiV31Ynv0M.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur


Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-12-15 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Mike,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 09:09:18AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 December 2018, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Mike,
> > hello Ondřej,
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > your package nodm has several unhandled debconf
> > > translations, some of then available for several months. I see that
> > > several uplaods have been made, is there a reason for not including
> > > those translations? Do you need help handling?
> > > 
> > > I'm currently trying (also in preparation for the freeze) to resolve
> > > those pending translation. In December I will consider if a l10n NMU
> > > is appropriate (which I would rather avoid, a MU is much better and of
> > > course better integrated in your workflow).
> > 
> > As I haven't got a reply, I will prepare a l10n NMU next week
> > considering #872178, #906170 and the lintian warning 
> > priority-extra-is-replaced-by-priority-optional
> > 
> > I also will look at #852125, the fix looks rather straightforward to
> > integrate.
> > 
> > If you want to do a MU (preferred) let me know.
> > 
> > Greetings
> > 
> >  Helge
> 
> Please push your changes to the packaging repo on 
> salsa.debian.org/debian/nodm. I will do the maintainer upload once you ping 
> me...

Thanks.

Can you grant me write access then? Currently I'm not allowed to push
to the repository.

Greetings

  Helge
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-12-15 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Helge,

On Saturday, 15 December 2018, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Mike,
> hello Ondřej,
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > your package nodm has several unhandled debconf
> > translations, some of then available for several months. I see that
> > several uplaods have been made, is there a reason for not including
> > those translations? Do you need help handling?
> > 
> > I'm currently trying (also in preparation for the freeze) to resolve
> > those pending translation. In December I will consider if a l10n NMU
> > is appropriate (which I would rather avoid, a MU is much better and of
> > course better integrated in your workflow).
> 
> As I haven't got a reply, I will prepare a l10n NMU next week
> considering #872178, #906170 and the lintian warning 
> priority-extra-is-replaced-by-priority-optional
> 
> I also will look at #852125, the fix looks rather straightforward to
> integrate.
> 
> If you want to do a MU (preferred) let me know.
> 
> Greetings
> 
>  Helge

Please push your changes to the packaging repo on salsa.debian.org/debian/nodm. 
I will do the maintainer upload once you ping me...

Mike

-- 
Sent from my Jolla

Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-12-14 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Mike,
hello Ondřej,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> your package nodm has several unhandled debconf
> translations, some of then available for several months. I see that
> several uplaods have been made, is there a reason for not including
> those translations? Do you need help handling?
> 
> I'm currently trying (also in preparation for the freeze) to resolve
> those pending translation. In December I will consider if a l10n NMU
> is appropriate (which I would rather avoid, a MU is much better and of
> course better integrated in your workflow).

As I haven't got a reply, I will prepare a l10n NMU next week
considering #872178, #906170 and the lintian warning 
priority-extra-is-replaced-by-priority-optional

I also will look at #852125, the fix looks rather straightforward to
integrate.

If you want to do a MU (preferred) let me know.

Greetings

 Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#872178: Status of debconf translation handling in nodm, help needed?

2018-11-14 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Mike,
hello Ondřej,
your package nodm has several unhandled debconf
translations, some of then available for several months. I see that
several uplaods have been made, is there a reason for not including
those translations? Do you need help handling?

I'm currently trying (also in preparation for the freeze) to resolve
those pending translation. In December I will consider if a l10n NMU
is appropriate (which I would rather avoid, a MU is much better and of
course better integrated in your workflow).

Greetings

 Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature