Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed
Le 31/08/2017 à 20:56, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Sorry my bad, then a binNMU should be sufficient. Yes this is the case here :-) > > But since you anyway plan an upload for #873783 this will en passant > also fix this problem. > >> but if I update the package version (to 0.0.2+dfsg-2), the >> upgrade test of piupart will also fails, while the -1 version of the >> package is not rebuilt in the Debian ftp-master. > There won't be any problems with piuparts when you upload 0.0.2+dfsg-2 Ok, I thought that a binNMU was first required to make it work first. I'll then wait a little to finish the update to close #873783 in the same time. Thanks, -- OPhilippe Thierry. /Y\/ Hardened embedded systems o#o GPG: 7010 9A3C E210 763E 6341 4581 C257 B91B CDAF C1EA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:43:35PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote: > Hello! > > Le 31/08/2017 à 16:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > > Package: wcc > > Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed > Thanks for the report. > > I've check where the error comes from. This is the result of the version > of binutils dependency (<2.29) generated by dpkg-buildpackage. The > source package only has a build dependency on binutils-dev (without > explicit version). > When building again the package, the Depends list is updated: > > Depends: libbinutils (>= 2.29), libbinutils (<< 2.30), libc6 (>= 2.14), > libcapstone3 (>= 3.0.0), libelf1 (>= 0.142), liblua5.3-0, libopenlibm2 (>= > 0.4), lua5.2 > > This means that a simple rebuild of wcc with uptodate sid should correct > the error, Sorry my bad, then a binNMU should be sufficient. But since you anyway plan an upload for #873783 this will en passant also fix this problem. > but if I update the package version (to 0.0.2+dfsg-2), the > upgrade test of piupart will also fails, while the -1 version of the > package is not rebuilt in the Debian ftp-master. There won't be any problems with piuparts when you upload 0.0.2+dfsg-2 cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed
Hello! Le 31/08/2017 à 16:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Package: wcc > Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed Thanks for the report. I've check where the error comes from. This is the result of the version of binutils dependency (<2.29) generated by dpkg-buildpackage. The source package only has a build dependency on binutils-dev (without explicit version). When building again the package, the Depends list is updated: Depends: libbinutils (>= 2.29), libbinutils (<< 2.30), libc6 (>= 2.14), libcapstone3 (>= 3.0.0), libelf1 (>= 0.142), liblua5.3-0, libopenlibm2 (>= 0.4), lua5.2 This means that a simple rebuild of wcc with uptodate sid should correct the error, but if I update the package version (to 0.0.2+dfsg-2), the upgrade test of piupart will also fails, while the -1 version of the package is not rebuilt in the Debian ftp-master. -- OPhilippe Thierry. /Y\/ Hardened embedded systems o#o GPG: 7010 9A3C E210 763E 6341 4581 C257 B91B CDAF C1EA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed
Package: wcc Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies: wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed -- System Information: Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)