Bug#874950: New version stable?
(CC previous sponsor as well) Hi, On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Hi Diego, > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:32 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:09:00 -0300 Diego Sarzi wrote: > > > Thank you Shenging Zhy for the contribution. > > > > > > Can you tell me how is the stability of keepassx with its modifications, > > > referring to QT4 for QT5? > > > > > > Can we use it for the unstable version? > > > > > > > Hi, I see you adopt this package. That's great. > > > > I don't know the stability. But I have used this version after I > > uploaded it experimental, and didn't have any problem. > > As keepassx will be removed from testing at 02 Sept, what's the plan > for you to upload the qt5 version? Do you need sponsor? I'm glad to > help. > This bug is RC and keepassx will be removed in 2 days. But I haven't received your response. So I'm going to NMU keepassx in DELAY/2-day, please tell me I should cancel it or speed it up. The full changelog can be seen at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/keepassx/compare/8da06bb...66024d9 Thanks. -- Shengjing Zhu
Bug#874950: New version stable?
Hi Diego, On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:32 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:09:00 -0300 Diego Sarzi wrote: > > Thank you Shenging Zhy for the contribution. > > > > Can you tell me how is the stability of keepassx with its modifications, > > referring to QT4 for QT5? > > > > Can we use it for the unstable version? > > > > Hi, I see you adopt this package. That's great. > > I don't know the stability. But I have used this version after I > uploaded it experimental, and didn't have any problem. As keepassx will be removed from testing at 02 Sept, what's the plan for you to upload the qt5 version? Do you need sponsor? I'm glad to help. -- Shengjing Zhu
Bug#874950: New version stable?
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:09:00 -0300 Diego Sarzi wrote: > Thank you Shenging Zhy for the contribution. > > Can you tell me how is the stability of keepassx with its modifications, > referring to QT4 for QT5? > > Can we use it for the unstable version? > Hi, I see you adopt this package. That's great. I don't know the stability. But I have used this version after I uploaded it experimental, and didn't have any problem.
Bug#874950: New version stable?
Thank you Shenging Zhy for the contribution. Can you tell me how is the stability of keepassx with its modifications, referring to QT4 for QT5? Can we use it for the unstable version?
