Bug#877232: u-boot-rockchip: u-boot-spl-dtb.bin missing

2020-04-20 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 4/20/20 7:10 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Control: tags 877232 moreinfo
>
> On 2017-09-29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 09/29/2017 09:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2017-09-29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
 usr/share/doc/u-boot-rockchip/README.rockchip.gz asks for copying
 u-boot-spl-dtb.bin to the SD card.

 File /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3399/spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin is not
 provided by the package.
>>>
>>> It's identical to u-boot-spl.bin, as of a few releases ago. I think
>>> the logic was to default to the dtb variant if the platform
>>> supports dtb, since that's what is actually needed in most cases.
>>>
>>>
 So either some documentation for RK3399 should be added or a file
 is missing.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing the upstream documentation needs a minor update. There
>>> are probably other README files in a similar situation.
> ...
>> Yes you are right this is the relevant command in U-Boot:
>> cmd_spl/u-boot-spl.bin := cp spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin
>
> While README.rockchip still still contains references to
> u-boot-spl-dtb.bin, the README.Debian now documents using idbloader.img,
> which seems to be consistantly used across most rockchip platforms.
>
> Is that sufficient, or should this bug stay open?
>
>
> live well,
>   vagrant
>
Hello Vagrant,

thanks for caring. Please, close the issue.

Best regards

Heinrich



Bug#877232: u-boot-rockchip: u-boot-spl-dtb.bin missing

2020-04-20 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: tags 877232 moreinfo

On 2017-09-29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 09:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2017-09-29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> usr/share/doc/u-boot-rockchip/README.rockchip.gz asks for copying
>>> u-boot-spl-dtb.bin to the SD card.
>>> 
>>> File /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3399/spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin is not
>>> provided by the package.
>> 
>> It's identical to u-boot-spl.bin, as of a few releases ago. I think
>> the logic was to default to the dtb variant if the platform
>> supports dtb, since that's what is actually needed in most cases.
>> 
>> 
>>> So either some documentation for RK3399 should be added or a file
>>> is missing.
>> 
>> I'm guessing the upstream documentation needs a minor update. There
>> are probably other README files in a similar situation.
...
> Yes you are right this is the relevant command in U-Boot:
> cmd_spl/u-boot-spl.bin := cp spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin

While README.rockchip still still contains references to
u-boot-spl-dtb.bin, the README.Debian now documents using idbloader.img,
which seems to be consistantly used across most rockchip platforms.

Is that sufficient, or should this bug stay open?


live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#877232: u-boot-rockchip: u-boot-spl-dtb.bin missing

2017-09-29 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 09/29/2017 09:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2017-09-29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> usr/share/doc/u-boot-rockchip/README.rockchip.gz asks for copying
>> u-boot-spl-dtb.bin to the SD card.
>> 
>> File /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3399/spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin is not
>> provided by the package.
> 
> It's identical to u-boot-spl.bin, as of a few releases ago. I think
> the logic was to default to the dtb variant if the platform
> supports dtb, since that's what is actually needed in most cases.
> 
> 
>> So either some documentation for RK3399 should be added or a file
>> is missing.
> 
> I'm guessing the upstream documentation needs a minor update. There
> are probably other README files in a similar situation.
> 
> 
> live well, vagrant
> 

Yes you are right this is the relevant command in U-Boot:
cmd_spl/u-boot-spl.bin := cp spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin

Regards

Heinrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=CeoZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#877232: u-boot-rockchip: u-boot-spl-dtb.bin missing

2017-09-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2017-09-29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> usr/share/doc/u-boot-rockchip/README.rockchip.gz asks for
> copying u-boot-spl-dtb.bin to the SD card.
>
> File /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3399/spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin is
> not provided by the package.

It's identical to u-boot-spl.bin, as of a few releases ago. I think the
logic was to default to the dtb variant if the platform supports dtb,
since that's what is actually needed in most cases.


> So either some documentation for RK3399 should be added
> or a file is missing.

I'm guessing the upstream documentation needs a minor update. There are
probably other README files in a similar situation.


live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#877232: u-boot-rockchip: u-boot-spl-dtb.bin missing

2017-09-29 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Package: u-boot-rockchip
Version: 2017.07+dfsg1-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

usr/share/doc/u-boot-rockchip/README.rockchip.gz asks for
copying u-boot-spl-dtb.bin to the SD card.

File /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3399/spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin is
not provided by the package.

So either some documentation for RK3399 should be added
or a file is missing.

Best regards

Heinrich Schuchardt

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-2-arm64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=locale: Cannot set 
LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 
(charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or 
directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

-- debconf information excluded