Bug#881578: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#881578: watcher: Wrong encoding in Portuguese debconf translation

2017-11-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org):
> On 11/13/2017 07:11 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Source: watcher
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: l10n
> > 
> > The Portuguese translaiton of debconf messages sent in #876177 claims
> > to be UTF-8 encoded while it is indeed ISO-8859-1.
> > 
> > Please find attached to the report a fixed version of this file.
> 
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
> It's nice to see doing stuff for Debian again.

I'm still doing things...;-). Mostly D-I Irelated, though much much
less active nowadays. Also, maintaining a few sports-related
packagesand still monitoring some of the l10n infrastructure
tools. The latter is what made me discover this encoding problem.

> 
> I'll fix this ASAP, however, it looks like there's a few other pt.po
> that were recently sent to the BTS that had the same issue. If you could
> identify them, it'd be great, and then just tell me the list, and I can
> convert them myself (using whatever you will suggest). IMO, no need for
> a bug report for it, I can simply push it to Git and to Debian.


Well, indeed, I haven't spotted any other such problem. For the
record, the problem ehre was spotted by one of the l10n scripts : the
one that builds a giant "compendium" of debconf translations for  each
language. Theoretically, any other such problem should be spotted by
this script and I haven't seen anything as of now.




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#881578: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#881578: watcher: Wrong encoding in Portuguese debconf translation

2017-11-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/13/2017 07:11 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Source: watcher
> Severity: normal
> Tags: l10n
> 
> The Portuguese translaiton of debconf messages sent in #876177 claims
> to be UTF-8 encoded while it is indeed ISO-8859-1.
> 
> Please find attached to the report a fixed version of this file.


Hi Christian,

It's nice to see doing stuff for Debian again.

I'll fix this ASAP, however, it looks like there's a few other pt.po
that were recently sent to the BTS that had the same issue. If you could
identify them, it'd be great, and then just tell me the list, and I can
convert them myself (using whatever you will suggest). IMO, no need for
a bug report for it, I can simply push it to Git and to Debian.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)