Bug#885677: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 13:01, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > Hello, > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:22:41AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Le 02/04/2020 à 22:23, Thomas Leonard a écrit : > > > My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector) > > > depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr > > > due to this issue. > > that is, removed from testing. > > > > I can't upgrade to lablgtk3 because Debian/unstable only has an old > > > beta release of that (3.0~beta6-2), which is missing some functions. > > > > There is 3.1.0 in experimental. Does it suit your needs? Yes, 3.1.0 works fine with 0install. > > Ralf, what are your plans concerning lablgtk3? > > The only blocker for an upload of 3.1 is that the current version > of why3 was not compiling with lablgtk3.1. Now, there is a new > version of why3, which does, but there are a few issues with it > that I wanted to resolve before uploading the new why3 and lablgtk 3.1 > to sid. Some more urgent issues with other packages took the > priority in the meantime. Now it is a bit late, as April 4 is tomorrow. > > Would it really be a big problem when zeroinstall-injector temporarilly > drops out of testing? > > > Just wait. Either lablgtk2 leaves testing and I will fix it quickly and > > it (and its reverse dependencies such as your package) will migrate back > > to testing. Or lablgtk3 will be updated. OK, I'll wait a few days and see what happens then. Thanks, -- talex5 (GitHub/Twitter)http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: 5DD5 8D70 899C 454A 966D 6A51 7513 3C8F 94F6 E0CC
Bug#885677: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
Hello, On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:22:41AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 02/04/2020 à 22:23, Thomas Leonard a écrit : > > My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector) > > depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr > > due to this issue. that is, removed from testing. > > I can't upgrade to lablgtk3 because Debian/unstable only has an old > > beta release of that (3.0~beta6-2), which is missing some functions. > > There is 3.1.0 in experimental. Does it suit your needs? > > Ralf, what are your plans concerning lablgtk3? The only blocker for an upload of 3.1 is that the current version of why3 was not compiling with lablgtk3.1. Now, there is a new version of why3, which does, but there are a few issues with it that I wanted to resolve before uploading the new why3 and lablgtk 3.1 to sid. Some more urgent issues with other packages took the priority in the meantime. Now it is a bit late, as April 4 is tomorrow. Would it really be a big problem when zeroinstall-injector temporarilly drops out of testing? > Just wait. Either lablgtk2 leaves testing and I will fix it quickly and > it (and its reverse dependencies such as your package) will migrate back > to testing. Or lablgtk3 will be updated. I hope to be able to work on the why3/lablgtk3 issue next week. -Ralf.
Bug#885677: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
Le 02/04/2020 à 22:23, Thomas Leonard a écrit : > My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector) > depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr > due to this issue. > > I can't upgrade to lablgtk3 because Debian/unstable only has an old > beta release of that (3.0~beta6-2), which is missing some functions. There is 3.1.0 in experimental. Does it suit your needs? Ralf, what are your plans concerning lablgtk3? > I'm not using the gtksourceview2 part, so dropping that would be OK for me. I am planning to disable the gtksourceview2 part of lablgtk2 when lablgtk2 effectively leaves testing. I am waiting, because I already disabled it once, and gtksourceview2 maintainers changed their mind, and I had to re-enable it. I don't want to disable/enable it again so I want to be sure that gtksourceview2 has effectively left testing before doing it. > What do you recommend? Just wait. Either lablgtk2 leaves testing and I will fix it quickly and it (and its reverse dependencies such as your package) will migrate back to testing. Or lablgtk3 will be updated. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Bug#885677: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
Hi, My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector) depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr due to this issue. I can't upgrade to lablgtk3 because Debian/unstable only has an old beta release of that (3.0~beta6-2), which is missing some functions. I'm not using the gtksourceview2 part, so dropping that would be OK for me. What do you recommend? Thanks, -- talex5 (GitHub/Twitter)http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: 5DD5 8D70 899C 454A 966D 6A51 7513 3C8F 94F6 E0CC
Bug#885677: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
Control: tag -1 - pending Control: severity -1 important Le 14/12/2018 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit : > gtksourceview2 will be included in Debian 10 "Buster" but we will try > to remove it early in the Bullseye series. [1] > > Therefore, I suggest bringing that package back, then you can lower > the severity of this bug to Important. We'll have to figure something > out for Bullseye. I've just uploaded lablgtk2 with its gtksourceview2 component back in. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Bug#885677: liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml: Depends on unmaintained gtksourceview2
Control: reopen -1 You can't drop liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml-dev as long as stuff still depends and build-depends on it. coq lablgtk-extra laby marionnet gtksourceview2 will be included in Debian 10 "Buster" but we will try to remove it early in the Bullseye series. [1] Therefore, I suggest bringing that package back, then you can lower the severity of this bug to Important. We'll have to figure something out for Bullseye. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/11/msg00570.html Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
