Bug#886768: Processed: Looks pretty RC to me

2018-01-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 09:34:22PM -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 06:45:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > 
> > > severity 886768 serious
> 
> Could you say a bit more about why you feel that all binary packages
> from src:openafs should be subject to autoremoval

It doesn't even trigger autoremoval as long as the BTS thinks
the bug is not in testing.

> when only the
> functionality of openafs-modules-dkms and openafs-modules-source is
> affected?

That's two binary packages that each deserve a "completely broken"
RC bug.

> Thanks,
> 
> Ben

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



Bug#886768: Processed: Looks pretty RC to me

2018-01-14 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 06:45:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > severity 886768 serious

Could you say a bit more about why you feel that all binary packages
from src:openafs should be subject to autoremoval when only the
functionality of openafs-modules-dkms and openafs-modules-source is
affected?

Thanks,

Ben