Bug#894700: autorevision: move out of asciidoc

[dak180]

Attempting to switch to asciidoctor has resulted in several issues including a 
greater difficulty in keeping the builds reproducible (date insertion issues). 
In addition I am not fan of the asciidoctor style and bringing in asciidoc's 
directly would result in license contamination. Since asciidoc is no longer EOL 
with the release of a py3 version which should require no changes to 
autorevision, I would rather stick with that.

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 04:14:58 -0700 Joseph Herlant  wrote:
> Package: autorevision
> Version: 1.21-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> Asciidoc is currently facing its end of life and I'm working with the 
> different
> packages that depend on it to get its EOL go smooth.
> 
> There are several alternatives to asciidoc like asciidoctor for
> example (which is the replacement recommended by asciidoc developers).
> 
> Could you have your package migrated to an alternative system please?
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> Joseph
> 
> 


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Bug#894700: autorevision: move out of asciidoc

[Paul Wise]

Control: forwarded -1 ircs://irc.freenode.net/autorevision

On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 04:14 -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:

> Could you have your package migrated to an alternative system please?

I've asked upstream about this on IRC.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#894700: autorevision: move out of asciidoc

[Joseph Herlant]

Package: autorevision
Version: 1.21-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Asciidoc is currently facing its end of life and I'm working with the different
packages that depend on it to get its EOL go smooth.

There are several alternatives to asciidoc like asciidoctor for
example (which is the replacement recommended by asciidoc developers).

Could you have your package migrated to an alternative system please?

Thanks for your help,
Joseph