Bug#900537: Build NanoPi Neo 2 in u-boot-sunxi arm64

2018-06-01 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Paul R. Tagliamonte  wrote:
> Gah. I rewrote this patch from a clean branch. You're right that's a typo.
> I'll resend.
>
> T
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 3:43 AM Vagrant Cascadian  wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-05-31, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
>> > Attached is a patch to add a nanopi_neo2 u-boot binary in the
>> > u-boot-sunxi package.
>>
>> Thanks for working on it!
>>
>>
>> > I'm in the middle of modifying `u-boot-install-sunxi64` to be a bit
>> > more generic; but it's worked successfully with a bit of hacking.
>>
>> Cool! It might be worth it's own bug report when you've got patches for
>> it.
>>
>>
>> +++ u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets  2018-05-31 19:53:21.0
>> -0400
>> +# Paul Tagliamonte 
>> +armhf  sunxi   nanopi_neo2 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin
>>
>> Isn't the nanopi_neo2 an arm64 capable board (e.g. allwinner H5)? If so,
>> I have some doubts about u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin being the correct
>> target to install. The pine64_plus target might be a better basis.
>>
>>
>> live well,
>>   vagrant



-- 
:wq
diff -Nru u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/bin/u-boot-install-sunxi64 u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/bin/u-boot-install-sunxi64
--- u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/bin/u-boot-install-sunxi64	2018-05-10 15:07:03.0 -0400
+++ u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/bin/u-boot-install-sunxi64	2018-05-31 19:53:32.0 -0400
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 $FIT_GENERATOR *.dtb > u-boot.its
 mkimage -f u-boot.its u-boot.itb
 echo "Writing sunxi-spl"
-dd conv=notrunc if=sunxi-spl.bin of="$DEV" bs=8k seek=1
+dd conv=notrunc if=$(ls *sunxi*.bin) of="$DEV" bs=8k seek=1
 echo "Writing u-boot FIT image"
 dd conv=notrunc if=u-boot.itb of="$DEV" bs=8k seek=5
 sync "$DEV"
diff -Nru u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/changelog u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/changelog	2018-05-10 16:24:57.0 -0400
+++ u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/changelog	2018-05-31 19:53:32.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+u-boot (2018.05+dfsg-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * u-boot-sunxi: Add nanopi_neo2 target.
+
+ -- Paul Tagliamonte   Thu, 31 May 2018 19:53:32 -0400
+
 u-boot (2018.05+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets
--- u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets	2018-05-10 15:59:27.0 -0400
+++ u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets	2018-05-31 19:53:32.0 -0400
@@ -199,3 +199,6 @@
 sh4	-		r2dplus		u-boot.bin
 
 sh4	-		sh7785lcr_32bit	u-boot.bin
+
+# Paul Tagliamonte 
+arm64	sunxi		nanopi_neo2	u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin


Bug#900537: Build NanoPi Neo 2 in u-boot-sunxi arm64

2018-06-01 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
Gah. I rewrote this patch from a clean branch. You're right that's a typo.
I'll resend.

T

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 3:43 AM Vagrant Cascadian  wrote:

> On 2018-05-31, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Attached is a patch to add a nanopi_neo2 u-boot binary in the
> > u-boot-sunxi package.
>
> Thanks for working on it!
>
>
> > I'm in the middle of modifying `u-boot-install-sunxi64` to be a bit
> > more generic; but it's worked successfully with a bit of hacking.
>
> Cool! It might be worth it's own bug report when you've got patches for
> it.
>
>
> +++ u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets  2018-05-31 19:53:21.0 -0400
> +# Paul Tagliamonte 
> +armhf  sunxi   nanopi_neo2 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin
>
> Isn't the nanopi_neo2 an arm64 capable board (e.g. allwinner H5)? If so,
> I have some doubts about u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin being the correct
> target to install. The pine64_plus target might be a better basis.
>
>
> live well,
>   vagrant
>


Bug#900537: Build NanoPi Neo 2 in u-boot-sunxi arm64

2018-06-01 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2018-05-31, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> Attached is a patch to add a nanopi_neo2 u-boot binary in the
> u-boot-sunxi package.

Thanks for working on it!


> I'm in the middle of modifying `u-boot-install-sunxi64` to be a bit
> more generic; but it's worked successfully with a bit of hacking.

Cool! It might be worth it's own bug report when you've got patches for
it.


+++ u-boot-2018.05+dfsg/debian/targets  2018-05-31 19:53:21.0 -0400
+# Paul Tagliamonte 
+armhf  sunxi   nanopi_neo2 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin

Isn't the nanopi_neo2 an arm64 capable board (e.g. allwinner H5)? If so,
I have some doubts about u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin being the correct
target to install. The pine64_plus target might be a better basis.


live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#900537: Build NanoPi Neo 2 in u-boot-sunxi arm64

2018-05-31 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
Package: u-boot
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
thanks

Attached is a patch to add a nanopi_neo2 u-boot binary in the
u-boot-sunxi package.

I'm in the middle of modifying `u-boot-install-sunxi64` to be a bit
more generic; but it's worked successfully with a bit of hacking.

   Paul

-- 
:wq


nanopi-neo-2
Description: Binary data