Bug#905559: Bug#902263: Bug#905559: Bug#902263: Affecting Qt transition
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 17:26:59 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer escribió: [snip] > /me facepalms > > Ah, indeed, my bad! It's frameworks, not PIM. Sorry about that. Paul, RT: my most sincere apologies. I don't know how but I got to mix frameworks with PIM. Frameworks is indeed another thing. I have just checked upstream's CI and they have not checked the tests against 5.11 (which is odd), but I'll file the bug as appropriate. Again, my apologies. -- Sobre Argentina: "sé que es uno de los países mas hospitalarios del mundo" Albert Einstein Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#902263: Bug#905559: Bug#902263: Affecting Qt transition
Hey, > That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly > failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE PIM > stack (not the meta package). ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and not KDE PIM. For KDE PIM the argument of not being up-to-date and not being ready for Qt 5.11 may be/is valid. But Framworks is uptodate with 5.47 (released in June) and it should be Qt 5.11 ready - So you should considering filing a bug about this regression upstream. hefee signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#902263: Bug#905559: Bug#902263: Affecting Qt transition
El lun., 6 de ago. de 2018 17:23, Sandro Knauß escribió: > Hey, > > > That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly > > failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE > PIM > > stack (not the meta package). > > ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and not KDE PIM. For KDE PIM the argument of > not > being up-to-date and not being ready for Qt 5.11 may be/is valid. But > Framworks is uptodate with 5.47 (released in June) and it should be Qt > 5.11 > ready - So you should considering filing a bug about this regression > upstream. > /me facepalms Ah, indeed, my bad! It's frameworks, not PIM. Sorry about that. So yes, I'll file the bug. >