Bug#902941: libuv1/1.21.0-1 appears to break lua-luv/1.9.1-0-2 autopkgtest
Control: retitle -1 libuv1 1.21 broke ABI without SONAME bump Control: severity -1 serious Control: affects -1 nodejs Hi, On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 13:14:23 +0200 Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:46:30 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > ok 9 fs - fs.scandir > > ./tests/test-fs.lua:83: UNKNOWN FS TYPE 29 > > Looks like this issue has been fixed in upstream lua: > > https://github.com/luvit/luv/commit/853546063c88f0f06b680844b8a2c90dc13343d3 Lua had a bug, but the change was done incorrectly in libuv. The numbering of enum values changed between 1.20 and 1.21, thus any binary compiled for 1.20 can be subtly broken by upgrading to 1.21. In particular, the lchown uv_fs_type was not added at the end[1]. This breaks ABI and should require a transition. See also the abi tracker report: https://abi-laboratory.pro/index.php?view=compat_report=libuv=1.20.3=1.21.0=121f9=abi This affects nodejs too. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libuv1/commit/aa28f7d5bf36b4df1e606ed47364d91d896b1f8b#1b6daa9127cce1f350074cef165b370bd83dfdcb_1144_1144 Saludos
Bug#902941: libuv1/1.21.0-1 appears to break lua-luv/1.9.1-0-2 autopkgtest
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:46:30 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > ok 9 fs - fs.scandir > ./tests/test-fs.lua:83: UNKNOWN FS TYPE 29 Looks like this issue has been fixed in upstream lua: https://github.com/luvit/luv/commit/853546063c88f0f06b680844b8a2c90dc13343d3 All the best
Bug#902941: libuv1/1.21.0-1 appears to break lua-luv/1.9.1-0-2 autopkgtest
Source: libuv1, lua-luv Version: libuv1/1.21.0-1 Version: lua-luv/1.9.1-0-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainers, With a recent upload of libuv1 the autopkgtest of lua-luv started to fail in unstable and testing. I have copied the error below. Currently this regression is delaying the migration of libuv1 to testing by 13 days. Could you please investigate the situation and resolve which package needs to be fixed and assign it? More information about this bug and the reason of it can be found on https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation Paul https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/lua-luv/550804/log.gz ok 9 fs - fs.scandir ./tests/test-fs.lua:83: UNKNOWN FS TYPE 29 stack traceback: [C]: in function 'assert' ./tests/test-fs.lua:83: in function 'fn' ./lib/tap.lua:53: in function <./lib/tap.lua:42> [C]: in function 'xpcall' ./lib/tap.lua:42: in function 'run' ./lib/tap.lua:136: in function 'tap' tests/run.lua:35: in main chunk [C]: ? not ok 10 fs - fs.realpath signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
