Bug#909014: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#909014: pinentry-efl binary package build request
On 17/09/2018 22:54, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: i hadn't heard from any debian users that this was desirable Hope pkg-e-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org will say this is desirable. Is it possible to subscribe it to this bug? do you think that pinentry-efl should talk to libsecret (the way that pinentry-gnome3 and pinentry-gtk2 do), or do you think it should be independent of libsecret? I even don't understand why pinentry-gnome3/gtk2 depends on libsecret and pinentry-qt/fltk does not. Are them statically compiled to do not make debian package dependencies? Anyway I thought pkg-e-devel should provide a more complete answer. -- sergio.
Bug#909014: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#909014: pinentry-efl binary package build request
Control: tags 909014 + moreinfo On Mon 2018-09-17 15:21:06 +0300, sergio wrote: > Please make a new binary packages with --enable-pinentry-efl for > enlightenment. thanks for your suggestion! I'd put off doing this because i hadn't heard from any debian users that this was desirable. do you think that pinentry-efl should talk to libsecret (the way that pinentry-gnome3 and pinentry-gtk2 do), or do you think it should be independent of libsecret? > https://github.com/gpg/pinentry/commit/948105b7a34ec9a9e5479d376b7c86bafee50a01 this isn't a standard GnuPG git reference -- please use https://dev.gnupg.org/ links for upstream pointers! --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature
