Bug#910000: [pkg-netfilter-team] Adopting xtables-addons
On 2020-10-27, at 13:41:59 +, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > On 2020-10-21, at 13:17:53 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > I just invited you to be a maintainer in the > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-xtables-addons > > repository. > > > > Ping me if you find you don't have permissions for something. > > All working. Thanks. > > > Once you are happy with the package code, feel free to push the code > > to the pkg-netfilter-team repo and start using in from that moment > > onwards. > > > > All links in files in the debian/ dir should point to this > > pkg-netfilter-team repo (i.e, VCS-* etc). Please also use the common > > maintainer address like in any other package in the team. > > Done. > > I've updated the package to the latest upstream version and pushed > everything to the pkg-netfilter-team repo. It would be good to get some feedback, and I am not a DM, so I will need someone to upload the package for me. Arturo, do you have time to review it and upload it? J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#910000: [pkg-netfilter-team] Adopting xtables-addons
On 2020-10-21, at 13:17:53 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 2020-10-19 09:53, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > On 2020-09-06, at 09:51:22 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > > On 2020-08-26, at 11:21:23 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > > > On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 11:20:40 +0100 Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > > > > There is a RFA bug for xtables-addons (cc'ed): > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=91 > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking about offering to adopt the package, but I'm > > > > > still a bit of a novice at maintaining packages in Debian, so > > > > > although it's fairly stable and doesn't see a lot of activity > > > > > upstream, it occurred to me that it might make more sense for > > > > > it to be adopted by the Netfilter team and to offer to help > > > > > out in that context. > > > > > > > > > > Does this seem like a good idea? Shall I add it to > > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks? > > > > > > > > Please go ahead. > > > > > > I've pushed a lot of changes, including work to package the latest > > > upstream release, to my fork of the old Salsa repo: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/azazel/xtables-addons > > > > > > What is the next step towards getting it into the new repo? > > I just invited you to be a maintainer in the > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-xtables-addons > repository. > > Ping me if you find you don't have permissions for something. All working. Thanks. > Once you are happy with the package code, feel free to push the code > to the pkg-netfilter-team repo and start using in from that moment > onwards. > > All links in files in the debian/ dir should point to this > pkg-netfilter-team repo (i.e, VCS-* etc). Please also use the common > maintainer address like in any other package in the team. Done. I've updated the package to the latest upstream version and pushed everything to the pkg-netfilter-team repo. J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#910000: [pkg-netfilter-team] Adopting xtables-addons
On 2020-10-19 09:53, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > On 2020-09-06, at 09:51:22 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote: >> On 2020-08-26, at 11:21:23 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: >>> On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 11:20:40 +0100 Jeremy Sowden wrote: There is a RFA bug for xtables-addons (cc'ed): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=91 I was thinking about offering to adopt the package, but I'm still a bit of a novice at maintaining packages in Debian, so although it's fairly stable and doesn't see a lot of activity upstream, it occurred to me that it might make more sense for it to be adopted by the Netfilter team and to offer to help out in that context. Does this seem like a good idea? Shall I add it to https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks? >>> >>> Please go ahead. >>> >>> I just created this in the wiki: >>> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks#Task:_xtables-addons_refresh >> >> Thanks! You got my surname wrong, btw: right letters, wrong order. :) >> Fixed! >> I've pushed a lot of changes, including work to package the latest >> upstream release, to my fork of the old Salsa repo: >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/azazel/xtables-addons >> >> What is the next step towards getting it into the new repo? > > Please forgive the gentle nudge, but some feedback would be appreciated. > Sorry for the delay. I just invited you to be a maintainer in the https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-xtables-addons repository. Ping me if you find you don't have permissions for something. Once you are happy with the package code, feel free to push the code to the pkg-netfilter-team repo and start using in from that moment onwards. All links in files in the debian/ dir should point to this pkg-netfilter-team repo (i.e, VCS-* etc). Please also use the common maintainer address like in any other package in the team. Unrelated to your package, we would eventually need to move to a more modern approach for the Maintainer: address, probably using the tracker.d.o address. I didn't pay enough attention to this and I'm not sure what is the right path. regards. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#910000: [pkg-netfilter-team] Adopting xtables-addons
On 2020-09-06, at 09:51:22 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > On 2020-08-26, at 11:21:23 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 11:20:40 +0100 Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > > There is a RFA bug for xtables-addons (cc'ed): > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=91 > > > > > > I was thinking about offering to adopt the package, but I'm still > > > a bit of a novice at maintaining packages in Debian, so although > > > it's fairly stable and doesn't see a lot of activity upstream, it > > > occurred to me that it might make more sense for it to be adopted > > > by the Netfilter team and to offer to help out in that context. > > > > > > Does this seem like a good idea? Shall I add it to > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks? > > > > Please go ahead. > > > > I just created this in the wiki: > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks#Task:_xtables-addons_refresh > > Thanks! You got my surname wrong, btw: right letters, wrong order. :) > > I've pushed a lot of changes, including work to package the latest > upstream release, to my fork of the old Salsa repo: > > https://salsa.debian.org/azazel/xtables-addons > > What is the next step towards getting it into the new repo? Please forgive the gentle nudge, but some feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#910000: [pkg-netfilter-team] Adopting xtables-addons
On 2020-08-26, at 11:21:23 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 11:20:40 +0100 Jeremy Sowden wrote: > > There is a RFA bug for xtables-addons (cc'ed): > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=91 > > > > I was thinking about offering to adopt the package, but I'm still a > > bit of a novice at maintaining packages in Debian, so although it's > > fairly stable and doesn't see a lot of activity upstream, it > > occurred to me that it might make more sense for it to be adopted by > > the Netfilter team and to offer to help out in that context. > > > > Does this seem like a good idea? Shall I add it to > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks? > > Please go ahead. > > I just created this in the wiki: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks#Task:_xtables-addons_refresh Thanks! You got my surname wrong, btw: right letters, wrong order. :) I've pushed a lot of changes, including work to package the latest upstream release, to my fork of the old Salsa repo: https://salsa.debian.org/azazel/xtables-addons What is the next step towards getting it into the new repo? J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
