Bug#921637: [pkg-go] Bug#921637: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:165:in `block_filter': undefined method
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 09:55:16PM -0500, Andrew Janke wrote: > I've confirmed this is the https://github.com/apjanke/ronn-ng/issues/24 bug > in ronn-ng. > > It looks liike an easy fix and I have pushed a ronn-ng 0.8.1.beta.1 > gem/release with the fix. Are you able to test against a prerelease gem? > > I've tested locally and it fixed the problem for git-lfs man generation. > I've also added an ordered-list example to Ronn-NG's internal test suite. It would be great if we could get this patch into buster. I realize that a new version may not be possible, but applying a patch to fix an FTBFS might be. As an upstream Git LFS maintainer, I'm already seeing people trying to build git-lfs packages on buster and (in Ubuntu) disco and failing to do so because of this bug. It will be difficult for us to build our own packages on buster if this isn't fixed. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#921637: [pkg-go] Bug#921637: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:165:in `block_filter': undefined method
I've confirmed this is the https://github.com/apjanke/ronn-ng/issues/24 bug in ronn-ng. It looks liike an easy fix and I have pushed a ronn-ng 0.8.1.beta.1 gem/release with the fix. Are you able to test against a prerelease gem? I've tested locally and it fixed the problem for git-lfs man generation. I've also added an ordered-list example to Ronn-NG's internal test suite. Cheers, Andrew
Bug#921637: [pkg-go] Bug#921637: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:165:in `block_filter': undefined method
Hi folks. ronn-ng maintainer here. I've prioritized this bug since it's causing problems for Debian package builds. Cheers, Andrew Janke
Bug#921637: [pkg-go] Bug#921637: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:165:in `block_filter': undefined method
I just reassigned this to ronn. It looks like we are hitting the bug https://github.com/apjanke/ronn-ng/issues/24. Any man page with a numbered list appears to fail. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:03 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Package: git-lfs > Version: 2.6.1-3 > Severity: serious > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > > When rebuild git-lfs, it FTBFS: > > warn: unrecognized inline tag: ["p"] > html: man/git-lfs-untrack.1.html+man > roff: man/git-lfs-update.1 > html: man/git-lfs-update.1.html +man > roff: man/git-lfs.1 > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:165:in `block_filter': undefined > method `position' for # > (NoMethodError) > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:88:in `block in > block_filter' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/nokogiri/xml/node_set.rb:204:in `block > in each' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/nokogiri/xml/node_set.rb:203:in `upto' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/nokogiri/xml/node_set.rb:203:in `each' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:88:in `block_filter' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:160:in `block_filter' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:88:in `block in > block_filter' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/nokogiri/xml/node_set.rb:204:in `block > in each' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/nokogiri/xml/node_set.rb:203:in `upto' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/nokogiri/xml/node_set.rb:203:in `each' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:88:in `block_filter' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:91:in `block_filter' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/roff.rb:18:in `initialize' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/document.rb:245:in `new' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/document.rb:245:in `to_roff' > from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ronn/document.rb:240:in `convert' > from /usr/bin/ronn:209:in `block (2 levels) in ' > from /usr/bin/ronn:199:in `each' > from /usr/bin/ronn:199:in `block in ' > from /usr/bin/ronn:184:in `each' > from /usr/bin/ronn:184:in `' > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 > > > I see ruby-ronn 0.8.0-1 was accepted on 2019-02-07, this may be the > reason. > > Please reassign to ruby-ronn if you think it's the bug in ruby-ronn > instead. > > - -- > Shengjing Zhu > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > iQFEBAEBCgAuFiEE85F2DZP0aJKsSKyHONAPABi+PjUFAlxcR7IQHHpoc2pAZGVi > aWFuLm9yZwAKCRA40A8AGL4+NTqRB/0TMPE3oaR0kUXa78k6HUizl9f5+Npxawn9 > OU1fFYEbY4yh4wZcXigqitBavnF3KvYpOWb4KbrKb04FYK3KOSWW/eXVKnQraSQc > YL57l2p2zEQVydKBt/9ADBskd13fxNLOVki/asiRN0MoHuiHw6vzZaWbCKyPlght > LE3CxXMuKLhAuUG+0BSliKRxNDHidcALEqKvmzmajgNccMeDvDSqO8ePy33YDvW2 > 3x8QDpm8emgy5+V1DCRRQbchKhbsrYQp+ali6/UPV4aEV8Um7QBCVTytr0819kDr > U2v+t8MCnBQiZ9a+znhvBfjRFi4cW6S0Gx+6hXKI6HvftepwV9zt > =RKLP > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > pkg-go-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers