Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 07:46:34AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi Nicolas, Hi Andreas, > On 2019-03-12 02:21, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > I didn't spot anything obviously broken in the new diff. \o/ Sorry this took so much back-and-forth, and thanks for your patience <3 > Just to verify again, the package currently has broken symlinks that are going > to be replaced by files, not directories? (Otherwise you would still need some > symlink_to_dir.) Correct :) Best, nicoo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
Hi Nicolas, On 2019-03-12 02:21, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:31:42AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> This needs a lot of more work :-( >> >> * is this usage of --link-doc valid? the packages don't have a strictly >> versioned Depends: lirc (= ${binary:version}), so I can install *only* >> liblirc0 and have a dangling /usr/share/doc/liblirc0 and e.g. no >> copyright file > > Right, that should have been liblirc0 (which they all depend on, transitively, > except for lirc-doc). However, I now noticed an interaction with lirc-doc > which > makes --link-doc particularly unadvisable (see below). I didn't spot anything obviously broken in the new diff. Just to verify again, the package currently has broken symlinks that are going to be replaced by files, not directories? (Otherwise you would still need some symlink_to_dir.) Thanks! Andreas
Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
Hi abe, On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:31:42AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > This needs a lot of more work :-( > > * is this usage of --link-doc valid? the packages don't have a strictly > versioned Depends: lirc (= ${binary:version}), so I can install *only* > liblirc0 and have a dangling /usr/share/doc/liblirc0 and e.g. no > copyright file Right, that should have been liblirc0 (which they all depend on, transitively, except for lirc-doc). However, I now noticed an interaction with lirc-doc which makes --link-doc particularly unadvisable (see below). Note to self: see if it's possible to detect that error automatically in lintian. > * in all the *.maintscript files, add 0.10.1-5.1~ as 'prior-version' > argument - you don't want to run this stuff again on *every* upgrade > > * lirc.maintscript has typos: /etx/... Thanks :) I didn't get yelled at by piuparts, so it went right through my testing... > * does the override_dh_installdocs target work with > dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B (i.e. building arch and indep packages separately) Yes, I tested that, build went fine :) (To be precise, sbuild --no-arch-all --arch-any && sbuild --arch-all --no-arch-any) > * lirc.postinst: using wildcards looks very fragile I tried using `-p lirc` but that didn't work, probably for the same reason dh-python wasn't doing it automatically in the first place. Would you prefer leaving #924158 open and not doing manually? > * lirc.posztrm: why do you manually delete conffiles on purge? dpkg does > that already. (If they are not conffiles, you can't use > dpkg-maintscript-helper on them.) The package was previously doing that, and I didn't touch that part of the postrm script, but I could remove the unecessary conffile handling if you'd like. I suspect that's the because the package previously installed the conffiles with a spurious .dist extension, and copied them to the right location during postinst, for some unscrutable reason. debian/rules had a comment saying it was “not to overwrite conffiles” but that makes little sense: dpkg won't overwrite user-modified conffiles by default. > PS: I hate cleaning up after misuse of --link-doc. Save brain cycles, > not bits on disks. Right now I'm afraid that you are turning a mess into > a greater mess. I'm not super keen on --link-doc either, but I didn't want to completely ignore the original package maintainer's intent. However, I just noticed additional complications -- lirc-doc shipping things in /usr/share/doc/lirc -- which make it a bad idea (or at least more annoying to implement than I care to), so I just reverted the change. On the other hand, I can agree this is a mess and I might not have a mop large enough... > PPS: I only looked at the debdiff, not at the package itself Appreciated regardless. :) Here is the diff compared to the previous proposed version, the full debdiff is attached: diff --git c/debian/changelog w/debian/changelog index 4681945..32b2dc1 100644 --- c/debian/changelog +++ w/debian/changelog @@ -3,16 +3,19 @@ lirc (0.10.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload * debian/rules -+ Replace rdfind-based dedup with dh_installdocs --link-doc - - This achieves the same effect (copyright, changelog, ... aren't -duplicated) cleanly and without RC-buggyness. (Closes: #919843) - - Add missing maintscripts for dir-to-symlink migration. -Thanks to Niels Thykier for spotting the bug. ++ Remove rdfind-based dedup (Closes: #919843) + Using dh_installdocs --link-docs was investigated, and rejected due to + - limited benefits; + - interactions between lirc-docs shipping files under /usr/share/doc/lirc, +but liblirc0 being the obvious candidate due to dependencies. + Do not install conffiles in a dummy location dpkg will, by default, not overwrite users' conffiles, so shipping them in a different location is superfluous. + * Removed liblircclient{0,-dev} +They were obsolete transitional packages that predated the stretch release. + * Rename debian/post{inst,rm} to lirc.post{inst,rm} * debian/lirc.{postinst,prerm}: Recompile and remove Python bytecode as needed Closes: #924158 @@ -23,7 +26,7 @@ lirc (0.10.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/changelog: Fix spelling in v0.10.1-4 - -- Nicolas Braud-Santoni Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:28:01 +0100 + -- Nicolas Braud-Santoni Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:33:40 +0100 lirc (0.10.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium diff --git c/debian/control w/debian/control index 1fc9231..8711007 100644 --- c/debian/control +++ w/debian/control @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Build-Depends: xsltproc # libjs-jquery + Package: lirc Architecture: any Depends: @@ -104,24 +105,6 @@ Description: Infra-red remote control support - Run-time libraries LIRC applications (lirc_private.so*) -Package: liblir
Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:07:57 +0100 Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 08:58:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > --link-doc requires dir-to-symlink migration via dpkg-maintscript-helper > > in the maintscript. I do not see that in the debdiff, so I assume the > > proposed changes will trigger a new bug (as I recall, an RC bug). > > Yes indeed! > Thanks for catching this, here is the debdiff for the updated package. > > I also fixed some other issues, like #924158. This needs a lot of more work :-( * is this usage of --link-doc valid? the packages don't have a strictly versioned Depends: lirc (= ${binary:version}), so I can install *only* liblirc0 and have a dangling /usr/share/doc/liblirc0 and e.g. no copyright file * in all the *.maintscript files, add 0.10.1-5.1~ as 'prior-version' argument - you don't want to run this stuff again on *every* upgrade * lirc.maintscript has typos: /etx/... * does the override_dh_installdocs target work with dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B (i.e. building arch and indep packages separately) * lirc.postinst: using wildcards looks very fragile * lirc.posztrm: why do you manually delete conffiles on purge? dpkg does that already. (If they are not conffiles, you can't use dpkg-maintscript-helper on them.) Andreas PS: I hate cleaning up after misuse of --link-doc. Save brain cycles, not bits on disks. Right now I'm afraid that you are turning a mess into a greater mess. PPS: I only looked at the debdiff, not at the package itself
Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 08:58:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > --link-doc requires dir-to-symlink migration via dpkg-maintscript-helper > in the maintscript. I do not see that in the debdiff, so I assume the > proposed changes will trigger a new bug (as I recall, an RC bug). Yes indeed! Thanks for catching this, here is the debdiff for the updated package. I also fixed some other issues, like #924158. Best, nicoo diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2019-01-01 15:19:01.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,30 @@ +lirc (0.10.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload + + * debian/rules ++ Replace rdfind-based dedup with dh_installdocs --link-doc + - This achieves the same effect (copyright, changelog, ... aren't +duplicated) cleanly and without RC-buggyness. (Closes: #919843) + - Add missing maintscripts for dir-to-symlink migration. +Thanks to Niels Thykier for spotting the bug. + ++ Do not install conffiles in a dummy location + dpkg will, by default, not overwrite users' conffiles, + so shipping them in a different location is superfluous. + + * Rename debian/post{inst,rm} to lirc.post{inst,rm} + * debian/lirc.{postinst,prerm}: Recompile and remove Python bytecode as needed +Closes: #924158 + + * debian/control: Fix relationships on liblirc{,client}-dev. +This should be Breaks+Replaces, not Conflict+Replaces. +Using the former should ensure that upgrading from stretch works smoothly. + + * debian/changelog: Fix spelling in v0.10.1-4 + + -- Nicolas Braud-Santoni Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:28:01 +0100 + lirc (0.10.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix upstream #343, --connect parsing error. @@ -11,7 +38,7 @@ lirc (0.10.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium [ Alec Leamas ] - * Dont use broken LOG_CONS syslog flag, closes: #872749. + * Don't use broken LOG_CONS syslog flag, closes: #872749. [ Pino Toscano ] * Fix build on !linux OS, restrict systemd only to linux OS. closes: #912400 diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/control lirc-0.10.1/debian/control --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/control 2019-01-01 15:19:01.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/control 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ python3-dev (>= 3.5), python3-setuptools, python3-yaml, - rdfind, socat [!hurd-any], systemd [linux-any], xsltproc @@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ #Multi-Arch: same Section: libdevel Provides: liblircclient-dev -Conflicts: liblircclient-dev (<< 0.9.1) +Breaks: liblircclient-dev (<< 0.9.1) Replaces: liblircclient-dev (<< 0.9.1) Depends: liblirc0 (= ${binary:Version}), diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc0.maintscript lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc0.maintscript --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc0.maintscript 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc0.maintscript 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dir_to_symlink /usr/share/doc/liblirc0 /usr/share/doc/lirc diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-client0.maintscript lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-client0.maintscript --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-client0.maintscript 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-client0.maintscript 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dir_to_symlink /usr/share/doc/liblirc-client0 /usr/share/doc/lirc diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient0.maintscript lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient0.maintscript --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient0.maintscript 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient0.maintscript 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dir_to_symlink /usr/share/doc/liblircclient0 /usr/share/doc/lirc diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient-dev.maintscript lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient-dev.maintscript --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient-dev.maintscript1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblircclient-dev.maintscript2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dir_to_symlink /usr/share/doc/liblircclient-dev /usr/share/doc/lirc diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-dev.maintscript lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-dev.maintscript --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-dev.maintscript 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/liblirc-dev.maintscript 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dir_to_symlink /usr/share/doc/liblirc-dev /usr/share/doc/lirc diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/lirc.maintscript lirc-0.10.1/debian/lirc.maintscript --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/lirc.maintscript 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/lirc.maintscript 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +mv_conffile /etx/lirc/lircd.conf.dist /etc/lirc/lircd.conf +mv_conffile /etx/lirc/lircmd.conf.dist /etc/lirc/lircmd.conf +mv_conffile /etx/lirc/irexec.lircrc.dist /etc/lirc/ir
Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Nicolas Braud-Santoni: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Control: block 919843 by -1 > > Dear release team, > > Please unblock package lirc, as I fixed an RC bug. > Note that the upload was to DELAYED/3, as it is a NMU. > > > Best, > > nicoo > > > diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog > --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2019-01-01 15:19:01.0 +0100 > +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 > @@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ > +lirc (0.10.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + * Non-maintainer upload > + * debian/rules: Replace rdfind-based dedup with dh_installdocs --link-doc > +This achieves the same effect (copyright, changelog, ... aren't > duplicated) > +cleanly and without RC-buggyness. (Closes: #919843) > + > [...] --link-doc requires dir-to-symlink migration via dpkg-maintscript-helper in the maintscript. I do not see that in the debdiff, so I assume the proposed changes will trigger a new bug (as I recall, an RC bug). Thanks, ~Niels
Bug#924161: unblock: lirc/0.10.1-5.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Control: block 919843 by -1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, Please unblock package lirc, as I fixed an RC bug. Note that the upload was to DELAYED/3, as it is a NMU. Best, nicoo diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog - --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2019-01-01 15:19:01.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/changelog2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ +lirc (0.10.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload + * debian/rules: Replace rdfind-based dedup with dh_installdocs --link-doc +This achieves the same effect (copyright, changelog, ... aren't duplicated) +cleanly and without RC-buggyness. (Closes: #919843) + + * debian/control: Fix relationships on liblirc{,client}-dev. +This should be Breaks+Replaces, not Conflict+Replaces. +Using the former should ensure that upgrading from stretch works smoothly. + + * debian/changelog: Fix spelling in v0.10.1-4 + + -- Nicolas Braud-Santoni Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:28:01 +0100 + lirc (0.10.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix upstream #343, --connect parsing error. @@ -11,7 +26,7 @@ lirc (0.10.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium [ Alec Leamas ] - - * Dont use broken LOG_CONS syslog flag, closes: #872749. + * Don't use broken LOG_CONS syslog flag, closes: #872749. [ Pino Toscano ] * Fix build on !linux OS, restrict systemd only to linux OS. closes: #912400 diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/control lirc-0.10.1/debian/control - --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/control 2019-01-01 15:19:01.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/control 2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ python3-dev (>= 3.5), python3-setuptools, python3-yaml, - - rdfind, socat [!hurd-any], systemd [linux-any], xsltproc @@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ #Multi-Arch: same Section: libdevel Provides: liblircclient-dev - -Conflicts: liblircclient-dev (<< 0.9.1) +Breaks: liblircclient-dev (<< 0.9.1) Replaces: liblircclient-dev (<< 0.9.1) Depends: liblirc0 (= ${binary:Version}), diff -Nru lirc-0.10.1/debian/rules lirc-0.10.1/debian/rules - --- lirc-0.10.1/debian/rules2019-01-01 15:19:01.0 +0100 +++ lirc-0.10.1/debian/rules2019-03-10 00:28:01.0 +0100 @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ for f in lircd.conf lircmd.conf irexec.lircrc lirc_options.conf; do \ mv debian/tmp/etc/lirc/$$f debian/tmp/etc/lirc/$$f.dist; \ done - - # De-duplicate docs - - rdfind -makesymlinks true debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/lirc override_dh_auto_test: ifneq "nocheck" "$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))" @@ -64,6 +62,10 @@ endif +override_dh_installdocs: + dh_installdocs --link-doc=lirc -a + dh_installdocs -p lirc-doc + override_dh_installsystemd: ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS), linux) dh_installsystemd -p lirc lircd.socket unblock lirc/0.10.1-5.1 - -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEEU7EqA8ZVHYoLJhPE5vmO4pLV7MsFAlyETwkRHG5pY29vQGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQ5vmO4pLV7MtsZw//VaakF1WKmQZogNQgcC4iyvFE1c6e4fue HlsHGiJonBOh259DkJUiWDrkGWXB8FdKfg8tmOmiMatwEloahHajjY+32RYglVgi 9sWIbTWE8GBv4Qe4P3epKWby2TR8zzz/gS8i35oKlQL/ikpyl0LBBHvDgr3drvbo HatUrqjcwIAkA0ANE0Qc3CD/mk40R+YQldq9K8x7SwPdPvqOR1SuWbFd99ykfVc3 pKGEjMgjtYW9+0DAKn4/CrfunkN9EXVdUK4QIZLhnUa7Rp8CkdNWO76l+oHZ5mv4 lfNtO7qcvPRPMrIigxg5lzE3xIJgjcsmE6O8+7YhkQZf+EEO9KoifQl8qLVe6ZxR qtG45tx6oVruf9iNTMAVu8f3Ph3x/BllCgg/9wK04YP69yvoxIxUwjB0wX07jXgz OoqRzbuz8pzGyUTWqqUmc7yvmHmSzNf9tfuqcNAhUhDR7XMRLl5YuP71v7jP1vfC 42OSyKbP8MHSaiCAkAoDQbNQMlUyXXRjKXOotn1a70aa9d7EweDRonLS+FbQIPRM waYpSBUIw41lQqQk+Zzq2PhMG/AHbDurT7q0QmPKu4aRpBUcpepmOwxJjcLvYmD3 werZS5tu2SCjtlVoeILxFOQBTQPTTqpV+AzMuDrC2+l0LGIP0Ge3W66oRisQPqyf 66uMn3mRtjw= =kQuD -END PGP SIGNATURE-