Package: sicherboot Version: 0.1.5 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Hallo Julian!
Recently, I've started running into a problem where my efi partition is so small that there isn't room to have two copies of the kernel living in the efi partition to do the signing operation. Looking at l111 of sicherboot, I don't see any reason off the top of my head why the sign_image operation needs to have the .jak-bak file stored in /boot/efi. We could switch to a file generated with mktemp to do the signing operation and then copy it back over. Obviously, this is a low priority -- I have a workaround for right now, and I really should just suck it up and expand my EFI partition. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages sicherboot depends on: ii binutils 2.31.1-15 ii efitools 1.8.1-1 ii systemd 241-3 ii uuid-runtime 2.33.1-0.1 sicherboot recommends no packages. sicherboot suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
