Bug#928367: libpapi5: SOVERSION is too wide for the runtime check in PAPI_library_init()

2019-05-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2019-05-20 11:25, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This bug is making papi marked to be auto-removed from Buster. Do we
> want to tag it as buster-ignore, or fix it there and not only in
> experimental?

I'd prefer to do the transition for buster, but haven't heard from the
RT, yet.


Andreas



Bug#928367: libpapi5: SOVERSION is too wide for the runtime check in PAPI_library_init()

2019-05-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello,

This bug is making papi marked to be auto-removed from Buster. Do we
want to tag it as buster-ignore, or fix it there and not only in
experimental?

Samuel



Bug#928367: libpapi5: SOVERSION is too wide for the runtime check in PAPI_library_init()

2019-05-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 pending patch fixed-upstream

On 2019-05-12 20:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
> in the thread on the upstream mailing list[1] you proposed a patch that
> was confirmed working by upstream.  Do you think this patch should be
> submitted to Debian BTS and the bug tagged patch?

It's already sitting in experimental/NEW .

Andreas



Bug#928367: libpapi5: SOVERSION is too wide for the runtime check in PAPI_library_init()

2019-05-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andreas,

in the thread on the upstream mailing list[1] you proposed a patch that
was confirmed working by upstream.  Do you think this patch should be
submitted to Debian BTS and the bug tagged patch?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

[1] 
https://groups.google.com/a/icl.utk.edu/forum/#!topic/perfapi-devel/Qgv4BpZl64U

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#928367: libpapi5: SOVERSION is too wide for the runtime check in PAPI_library_init()

2019-05-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: papi
Version: 5.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Forwarded: 
https://groups.google.com/a/icl.utk.edu/forum/#!topic/perfapi-devel/Qgv4BpZl64U

applications built against libpapi5 (5.6.*-*) don't run with libpapi5
(5.7.*-*) (and vice versa and for all other mismatching major.minor
combinations as well) due to the runtime check in PAPI_library_init()
and the way PAPI_library_init() is to be called.

Andreas