Bug#935568: sphinx-issuetracker: should this package be removed?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:35:27PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > it's possible `migrate` used to depend on > python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker but that's no longer the case, i > think? You are right, I was looking at old version. Filed RM bug: https://bugs.debian.org/935700. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#935568: sphinx-issuetracker: should this package be removed?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:59 PM Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > Hi Sandro! > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:46:30PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello, > > sphinx-issuetracker is currently incompatible with python3.7: > > [...] > > > > It has no reverse-dependencies and it's currently one of the few r-deps of > > python-debianbts. > > > > Should we just remove this package from Debian? > > I support the removal. > > However, there is one reverse build-dependency: src:migrate. i checked on dak and it reports no rdeps, either binary or source: ``` $ dak rm -Rn -b python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker Will remove the following packages from unstable: python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker | 0.11-2 | all Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team --- Reason --- -- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. ``` > But it looks like use of issuetracker is actually patched away: > https://sources.debian.org/src/migrate/0.12.0-3/debian/patches/disable_issuetracker.patch/ > > Dear migrate maintainers (Cc'ed), can you please check if that > build-dependency is still needed? it's possible `migrate` used to depend on python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker but that's no longer the case, i think? -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
Bug#935568: sphinx-issuetracker: should this package be removed?
Hi Sandro! On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:46:30PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > sphinx-issuetracker is currently incompatible with python3.7: > [...] > > It has no reverse-dependencies and it's currently one of the few r-deps of > python-debianbts. > > Should we just remove this package from Debian? I support the removal. However, there is one reverse build-dependency: src:migrate. But it looks like use of issuetracker is actually patched away: https://sources.debian.org/src/migrate/0.12.0-3/debian/patches/disable_issuetracker.patch/ Dear migrate maintainers (Cc'ed), can you please check if that build-dependency is still needed? -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#935568: sphinx-issuetracker: should this package be removed?
Source: sphinx-issuetracker Severity: serious Hello, sphinx-issuetracker is currently incompatible with python3.7: Exception occurred: File "/build/sphinx-issuetracker-0.11/sphinxcontrib/issuetracker/__init__.py", line 282, in connect_builtin_tracker from sphinxcontrib.issuetracker.resolvers import BUILTIN_ISSUE_TRACKERS File "/build/sphinx-issuetracker-0.11/sphinxcontrib/issuetracker/resolvers.py", line 138 except ImportError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax it has a very low popcon value It has no reverse-dependencies and it's currently one of the few r-deps of python-debianbts. Should we just remove this package from Debian? Thanks, Sandro -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.0 APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE= (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
