Bug#935767: Please remove Python 2 support and usage from uwsgi
control: tags -1 + patch On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 01:30:29 +0200 Thomas Goirand wrote: > Package: uwsgi > Version: 2.0.18-4 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > As python 2 is going away from Bullseye, we should remove any trace of Python > 2 > package from src:uwsgi, and also make it use Python 3 only. i've opened a MR to remove python2 support from src:uwsgi: https://salsa.debian.org/uwsgi-team/uwsgi/-/merge_requests/1 i found working on this package extremely hard, so there can be some areas i didnt cover completely, but the package builds fine and there are no more python2 dependencies It would be helpful if you could review, merge and release a new package, so that we can continue with the py2removal effort (uwsgi is at the top of the list) Regards, Sandro
Bug#935767: [pkg-uWSGI-devel] Bug#935767: Please remove Python 2 support and usage from uwsgi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 8/26/19 7:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Thomas Goirand (2019-08-26 01:30:29) >> Tags: patch > > Do a patch really exist covering _all_ which this bugreport covers? > > My impression from your description below is that a patch exist only f or > parts of the problem tracked here. - From the point of view of Debian, all is ok, we just need to add python3-six as (build-)depends. Though upstream also needs to express this in their setup.py stuff. > Thanks for your work on this, Thomas! My pleasure! Thomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3+Kkgn20FPaRPp/ST56os/RrPrsFAl1j2zYACgkQT56os/Rr Prtj6w//TW9LDHMm05zFSzEv77Pt+g3RU/Tk2M+YWlh7p9fLKClw6sRDsKYtDp+u xBicREmmO1nGXh3lg+c69a9W/1kwBOn5sOqNa5qdP/z9P4qY8jbcCK6d7K718bwH NOeHBLZpZSuvj6v/6Q/1Ha0+qMZ252CV3GVA4BUOm8PxV21auadEkUU9sNZXZK/m M8nAOD7WpDea3g+MOD3BVb6lo7mzwa3R+Hi8GZfPjcxQVlCgCvdN8r7cjWiiXi1X 0Jti8CaF9Dd2XZt9/2sjh3CNAbOl/hIDEaLn5nMbEeq0s2mR5yxDVeAJTFKguCu4 QKIF1KHflu2JsWOaP72I+5PkeD+SFfWAcDWActMcDuh02x3IG03llqmkeGimvCCt FhMczlaV7qklooJu3iQq3LVSKsMy0ZWiG8ycy+olxdFSubeRLaTyqIXWfHhxUKpI Y8YkXXeTqaoHVFKxdj3Xg1mEJh6vTpplTKEBwz8td7we96YFaUbHeZVl04GkeOYv CO3Q71Eeg5xBQ6Q7xsPAbXEVvxtAQJJ5b6Vwvne+lfWJ44/fLOUnszlGkVN4GCI6 Soj3V2toY79JRMAdTt51C/7++d/FK1cbODblhvPNVH5Rtq1o9m6499FFBfd0jEjy EbKs2Ex4DK/h1DHjsHRqHZUNSIK6AzCEPsqsqn+D4uJBGQZsAZ8= =r7bC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#935767: [pkg-uWSGI-devel] Bug#935767: Please remove Python 2 support and usage from uwsgi
Quoting Thomas Goirand (2019-08-26 01:30:29) > Tags: patch Do a patch really exist covering _all_ which this bugreport covers? My impression from your description below is that a patch exist only for parts of the problem tracked here. > As python 2 is going away from Bullseye, we should remove any trace of > Python 2 package from src:uwsgi, and also make it use Python 3 only. > > I've already opened a pull request upstream to fix (hopefuly all) of > the code regarding Python 3 compatibility: > > https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/pull/2062 > > Let's wait for a while to see if upstream merges it before fixing the > Debian package. Note that a no-py2 branch now exists in Salsa for > solving this bug, but as the patch is rather big, it'd be much nicer > if it could be first accepted upstream, and probably a new version > released. Thanks for your work on this, Thomas! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#935767: Please remove Python 2 support and usage from uwsgi
Package: uwsgi Version: 2.0.18-4 Severity: important Tags: patch As python 2 is going away from Bullseye, we should remove any trace of Python 2 package from src:uwsgi, and also make it use Python 3 only. I've already opened a pull request upstream to fix (hopefuly all) of the code regarding Python 3 compatibility: https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/pull/2062 Let's wait for a while to see if upstream merges it before fixing the Debian package. Note that a no-py2 branch now exists in Salsa for solving this bug, but as the patch is rather big, it'd be much nicer if it could be first accepted upstream, and probably a new version released. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
