Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: model-builder -- RoQA; dead upstream; unmaintained; low popcon; blocking py2 removal
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
Fine with me. Em ter, 28 de jan de 2020 08:26, Andreas Tille escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > if someone will show interest by writing an autopkgtest (or would > > > provide some test script to prove the functionality which I'd > > > volunteer to turn into an autopkgtest) I'd feel slightly motivated > > > to package BIP and try my luck with a Python3 port. > > > > Any objections to RM'ing model-builder? > > No objection, swamped with other Python3 ports myself. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > if someone will show interest by writing an autopkgtest (or would > > provide some test script to prove the functionality which I'd > > volunteer to turn into an autopkgtest) I'd feel slightly motivated > > to package BIP and try my luck with a Python3 port. > > Any objections to RM'ing model-builder? No objection, swamped with other Python3 ports myself. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: if someone will show interest by writing an autopkgtest (or would provide some test script to prove the functionality which I'd volunteer to turn into an autopkgtest) I'd feel slightly motivated to package BIP and try my luck with a Python3 port. Any objections to RM'ing model-builder? Scott
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
Hi, if someone will show interest by writing an autopkgtest (or would provide some test script to prove the functionality which I'd volunteer to turn into an autopkgtest) I'd feel slightly motivated to package BIP and try my luck with a Python3 port. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 09:51:32AM -0200, Flavio Coelho wrote: > Hello, > > Right now, I can't dedicate time towards porting ModelBuilder. It should be > a quick fix to port to Python3. BIP is already python3 compatible. > So whatever you decide is fine with me. > > thanks, > > Flávio Codeço Coelho > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:48 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:18:38PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Flávio, > > > > > > > > Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His > > > > effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian remained at version > > > > 0.4.1. In the process of migrating all Debian packages from Python2 to > > > > Python3 I stumbled upon this package and moved under Debian Science > > > > team maintenance[2]. > > > > > > > > I realised that version 0.4.6 need a Python module BIP[3]. (BTW, as a > > > > general remark: It would be nice if you would keep release tags in sync > > > > with PyPI.) Since BIP is not packaged for Debian I would consider > > doing > > > > so - but only Python3 modules are permitted to go into Debian. Since > > > > I'm not sure whether I will reach my original goal to get ModelBuilder > > > > converted to Python3 succesfully I wonder whether you can uncover some > > > > plan you might have with ModelBuilder whether you want to port it > > > > yourself do Python3. > > > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > > > Do you (or Flavio) plan on porting model-builder to Python 3? > > > > > > If not, I will probably just convert this to an RM request as it seems > > > model-builder is unmaintained upstream (and downstream). > > > > I have no personal interest in ModelBuilder - just spottet it as a > > reverse dependency of Python2 scipy and had a look whether we can bump > > this to Python3. The effort seemed to be more than a quick shot, > > thought. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Andreas. > > > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
Hello, Right now, I can't dedicate time towards porting ModelBuilder. It should be a quick fix to port to Python3. BIP is already python3 compatible. So whatever you decide is fine with me. thanks, Flávio Codeço Coelho On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:48 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:18:38PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > Hi Flávio, > > > > > > Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His > > > effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian remained at version > > > 0.4.1. In the process of migrating all Debian packages from Python2 to > > > Python3 I stumbled upon this package and moved under Debian Science > > > team maintenance[2]. > > > > > > I realised that version 0.4.6 need a Python module BIP[3]. (BTW, as a > > > general remark: It would be nice if you would keep release tags in sync > > > with PyPI.) Since BIP is not packaged for Debian I would consider > doing > > > so - but only Python3 modules are permitted to go into Debian. Since > > > I'm not sure whether I will reach my original goal to get ModelBuilder > > > converted to Python3 succesfully I wonder whether you can uncover some > > > plan you might have with ModelBuilder whether you want to port it > > > yourself do Python3. > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > Do you (or Flavio) plan on porting model-builder to Python 3? > > > > If not, I will probably just convert this to an RM request as it seems > > model-builder is unmaintained upstream (and downstream). > > I have no personal interest in ModelBuilder - just spottet it as a > reverse dependency of Python2 scipy and had a look whether we can bump > this to Python3. The effort seemed to be more than a quick shot, > thought. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
Hi Scott, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:18:38PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Flávio, > > > > Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His > > effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian remained at version > > 0.4.1. In the process of migrating all Debian packages from Python2 to > > Python3 I stumbled upon this package and moved under Debian Science > > team maintenance[2]. > > > > I realised that version 0.4.6 need a Python module BIP[3]. (BTW, as a > > general remark: It would be nice if you would keep release tags in sync > > with PyPI.) Since BIP is not packaged for Debian I would consider doing > > so - but only Python3 modules are permitted to go into Debian. Since > > I'm not sure whether I will reach my original goal to get ModelBuilder > > converted to Python3 succesfully I wonder whether you can uncover some > > plan you might have with ModelBuilder whether you want to port it > > yourself do Python3. > > Hi Andreas, > > Do you (or Flavio) plan on porting model-builder to Python 3? > > If not, I will probably just convert this to an RM request as it seems > model-builder is unmaintained upstream (and downstream). I have no personal interest in ModelBuilder - just spottet it as a reverse dependency of Python2 scipy and had a look whether we can bump this to Python3. The effort seemed to be more than a quick shot, thought. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Flávio, Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian remained at version 0.4.1. In the process of migrating all Debian packages from Python2 to Python3 I stumbled upon this package and moved under Debian Science team maintenance[2]. I realised that version 0.4.6 need a Python module BIP[3]. (BTW, as a general remark: It would be nice if you would keep release tags in sync with PyPI.) Since BIP is not packaged for Debian I would consider doing so - but only Python3 modules are permitted to go into Debian. Since I'm not sure whether I will reach my original goal to get ModelBuilder converted to Python3 succesfully I wonder whether you can uncover some plan you might have with ModelBuilder whether you want to port it yourself do Python3. Hi Andreas, Do you (or Flavio) plan on porting model-builder to Python 3? If not, I will probably just convert this to an RM request as it seems model-builder is unmaintained upstream (and downstream). Thanks, Scott
Bug#937061: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder
Hi Flávio, Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian remained at version 0.4.1. In the process of migrating all Debian packages from Python2 to Python3 I stumbled upon this package and moved under Debian Science team maintenance[2]. I realised that version 0.4.6 need a Python module BIP[3]. (BTW, as a general remark: It would be nice if you would keep release tags in sync with PyPI.) Since BIP is not packaged for Debian I would consider doing so - but only Python3 modules are permitted to go into Debian. Since I'm not sure whether I will reach my original goal to get ModelBuilder converted to Python3 succesfully I wonder whether you can uncover some plan you might have with ModelBuilder whether you want to port it yourself do Python3. Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://model-builder.sourceforge.net/ [2] For Debian readers the repository can be found here: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/model-builder [3] https://github.com/fccoelho/bayesian-inference -- http://fam-tille.de
