Bug#937462: Affected package has been fixed

2019-10-25 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 subunit should stop recommending python-junitxml
Control: submitter -2 !
Control: reassign -2 subunit
Control: block -1 by -2

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Neil Williams wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1073358/subunit-130-4-migrated-to-testing/
> 
> subunit has now migrated to testing with the fix for #938577
> 
> Is it time for an upload of pyjunitxml?

Unfortunately, I don't think so. subunit still recommends
python-junitxml. This can have one of two reasons:

 a) It actually still integrates with the python2 variant. (unlikely)
 b) It should be recommending python3-junitxml instead and this was a
 mistake in the python2 removal on the subunit side. (likely)

I fear we'll need another upload of subunit first.

> If you don't have time, is it ok to move this package to Debian Python Team 
> maintenance?

The package is orphaned. Moving it to DPMT is about the best thing that
could happen to the package. With my "previous NMUer of the
package"-hat, I will certainly not object to such a move. To the
contrary. Thanks for your work!

Helmut



Bug#937462: Affected package has been fixed

2019-10-23 Thread Neil Williams
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1073358/subunit-130-4-migrated-to-testing/

subunit has now migrated to testing with the fix for #938577

Is it time for an upload of pyjunitxml?

If you don't have time, is it ok to move this package to Debian Python Team 
maintenance?

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgp5TcaIMnl0A.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature