Bug#947351: package cloud-init
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:59:47 -0700 Noah Meyerhans wrote: > Any feedback on this is welcome. Hi Noah, thank you very much for this update. It really helps with network configuration as it includes https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/commit/a6faf3acef02bd8cd4d46ac9efeebf24b3f21d81 That said, static IP address configuration does not work because the generated cloud-init network interfaces file configures DNS like this: dns-nameservers 172.22.3.1 dns-search bap.lan But the images miss resolvconf. I have opened a bugreport at https://salsa.debian.org/cloud-team/debian-cloud-images/-/issues/24 since I thought that would be the relevant place for it. Otherwise it works fine, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 16:08 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > After a brief discussion with zigo@d.o I'm trying to prepare a > stable-pu update of cloud-init to address Bug #936030. > > I'm reusing the previous release.d.o bug report for 18.3-6 which > wasn't closed, please let me know if opening a new one is preferred. If people still want to try and progress the larger update, with this as a more targetted fix in the meantime, then a separate bug for the smaller change would make more sense. I've not reviewed the patch in any detail, but one note: + * Non-maintaiiner upload for buster-pu "maintainer". Regards, Adam
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
Control: retitile -1 buster-pu: package cloud-init/18.3-6+deb10u1 Control: tags + patch Hi, After a brief discussion with zigo@d.o I'm trying to prepare a stable-pu update of cloud-init to address Bug #936030. I'm reusing the previous release.d.o bug report for 18.3-6 which wasn't closed, please let me know if opening a new one is preferred. Regards, Aron cloud-init_18.3-6+deb10u1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
Hello, I tested the package. It works like a charm. I used packer to rebuild an image based on Debian 10, with a cloud-init shell script to grab your package [1]. Anyway, at the end, I have a new image, which contains your package. Then, I did 2 tests on OVH Public Cloud (OpenStack): 1 - spawn an instance and try SSH connection --> OK 2 - spawn an instance with a cloud-init script (bash) --> OK 3 - spawn an instance in a private network with custom routes given by DHCP [see bug 2] --> OK So on my side, everything is fine with this package. Let me know if I can do more. [1] https://gist.github.com/arnaudmorin/e43a00cff8b163ab5b79cd7269b017ef [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1821102 Cheers, -- Arnaud Morin On 27.03.20 - 15:59, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:24:07PM +0100, Arnaud MORIN wrote: > >Of course I can do some tests. > >Is the package available somewhere? > > OK, please grab and test the .deb from > > https://people.debian.org/~noahm/cloud-init/ > > Note that currently the package is named as though it's going to be > uploaded to buster-backports. The hope is to get it in through > stable-updates, in which case it'll be rebuilt with a different name. > > The sources are signed with my public key. The .deb has the following > sha256sum > > 37699358fc376793f9f72e0e6ff80006f814b043cacdafedbef051599780b3f0 > cloud-init_20.1-2~bpo10+1_all.deb > > Any feedback on this is welcome. Please let me know what specific > features you test (e.g. user creation, cloud-config package > installation, shell scripts, etc) and the details of the platform on > which you're testing. > > Thanks > noah >
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 15:59 -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Note that currently the package is named as though it's going to be
> uploaded to buster-backports. The hope is to get it in through
> stable-updates, in which case it'll be rebuilt with a different name.
Small point, but I assume you mean proposed-updates (and then stable).
Use of stable-updates is an additional and exceptional workflow, which
starts with proposed-updates in any case.
[Yes, with the benefit of hindsight, different decisions {c,sh}ould
have been made on various naming decisions on the archive / release /
security sides, but it's where we are.]
Regards,
Adam
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:24:07PM +0100, Arnaud MORIN wrote: >Of course I can do some tests. >Is the package available somewhere? OK, please grab and test the .deb from https://people.debian.org/~noahm/cloud-init/ Note that currently the package is named as though it's going to be uploaded to buster-backports. The hope is to get it in through stable-updates, in which case it'll be rebuilt with a different name. The sources are signed with my public key. The .deb has the following sha256sum 37699358fc376793f9f72e0e6ff80006f814b043cacdafedbef051599780b3f0 cloud-init_20.1-2~bpo10+1_all.deb Any feedback on this is welcome. Please let me know what specific features you test (e.g. user creation, cloud-config package installation, shell scripts, etc) and the details of the platform on which you're testing. Thanks noah signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:24:07PM +0100, Arnaud MORIN wrote: >Of course I can do some tests. >Is the package available somewhere? 20.1-2 is currently in unstable. I will backport it to buster once it reaches testing in a couple more days. I'll make it available for people to test at that point. noah
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
Hey, Of course I can do some tests. Is the package available somewhere? Cheers Le mer. 25 mars 2020 à 22:53, Noah Meyerhans a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:46:42PM +, Arnaud Morin wrote: > > I'd like to know if there is an ongoing plan to release cloud-init >19.2 > > in Buster repositories, so cloud users could use Debian 10 in a easier > > way. > > > > For example, the following bug: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1821102 > > is fixed on >19.2 and is affecting deployment of Debian on OpenStack > > based cloud providers. > > > > Let me know if I can help in any way. > > The cloud team is hoping to get cloud-init 20.1 into buster, for > multiple bug fixes as well as to add EC2 IMDSv2 support. We'll need > extensive testing to be confident enough to make such a change in > stable, though. Would you be able to test proposed 20.1 packages for > buster? > > noah > >
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:46:42PM +, Arnaud Morin wrote: > I'd like to know if there is an ongoing plan to release cloud-init >19.2 > in Buster repositories, so cloud users could use Debian 10 in a easier > way. > > For example, the following bug: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1821102 > is fixed on >19.2 and is affecting deployment of Debian on OpenStack > based cloud providers. > > Let me know if I can help in any way. The cloud team is hoping to get cloud-init 20.1 into buster, for multiple bug fixes as well as to add EC2 IMDSv2 support. We'll need extensive testing to be confident enough to make such a change in stable, though. Would you be able to test proposed 20.1 packages for buster? noah
Bug#947351: package cloud-init
Hello Debian Team, I'd like to know if there is an ongoing plan to release cloud-init >19.2 in Buster repositories, so cloud users could use Debian 10 in a easier way. For example, the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1821102 is fixed on >19.2 and is affecting deployment of Debian on OpenStack based cloud providers. Let me know if I can help in any way. Regards, -- Arnaud Morin
