Bug#948756: scgi: should this package be removed?

2020-01-14 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Latest code is on github:

https://github.com/nascheme/scgi

Latest commit was in Sept 2019.  I would upload a new package to
Debian but my GPG key has been removed and I have not yet been able
to find someone to sign a new key for me.

OTOH, I don't object to removing the package from Debian since I
suspect it is not heavily used and people can just install it from
the PyPI.



Bug#948756: scgi: should this package be removed?

2020-01-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: scgi
Severity: serious

Hello,
i think we should remove scgi from debian:

* upstream last release was in 2014. no commit ever since
* python2-only
* leaf package

If i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this package, i'll
file for its removal.

Regards,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE= 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled