Bug#952386: src:libseccomp: please add support for riscv64
On 2020-02-23 18:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 2/23/20 6:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > libseccomp fails to build on riscv64 as the support for this > > architecture is missing. It has just been added upstream: > > > > https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/5432e15521d5ce5a7d3f26bf78674cbaa9d73d1f > > Hmm, I wonder whether I can do this for m68k and sparc64 as well. But I > assume this also requires support in the kernel, doesn't it? Yes, you need first to add the kernel support. > I think Helge added support for it for hppa? Yes, hppa supports libseccomp a few years already, and the package builds fine there. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Bug#952386: src:libseccomp: please add support for riscv64
On 2/23/20 6:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > libseccomp fails to build on riscv64 as the support for this > architecture is missing. It has just been added upstream: > > https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/5432e15521d5ce5a7d3f26bf78674cbaa9d73d1f Hmm, I wonder whether I can do this for m68k and sparc64 as well. But I assume this also requires support in the kernel, doesn't it? I think Helge added support for it for hppa? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Bug#952386: src:libseccomp: please add support for riscv64
Package: src:libseccomp Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch upstream User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 Hi, libseccomp fails to build on riscv64 as the support for this architecture is missing. It has just been added upstream: https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/5432e15521d5ce5a7d3f26bf78674cbaa9d73d1f This patch applies directly on version from sid. I have tested simple seccomp examples on a 5.5 kernel (the first one with seccomp support on riscv64) and they work perfectly. Would it be possible to add this patch in the next upload of libseccomp? Thanks, Aurelien