> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Ritesh Raj Sarraf" <r...@debian.org>
> 发送时间: 2020-02-27 01:56:04 (星期四)
> 收件人: wg...@china.com, 952...@bugs.debian.org
> 抄送: 925...@bugs.debian.org
> 主题: Re: Bug#952506: Re: Bug#952506: Re: Bug#952506: Wired interface name
> maybe changed when reboot
>
> Control: serverity -1 important
>
>
> I am lowering the severity as this is common reflection of problems
> elsewhere disguising as a problem with laptop-mode-tools.
>
>
> Couple of things to mention:
>
> * If you know of the persistent name for your interface, can you
> populate that into the /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/ethernet.conf and see if
> that helps
I think it is not useful because that the first name of wired interface is
eth0, and systemd change it to enpXXX soon. So laptop may set the interface by
eth0 or enpXXX.
>
> * From the logs that you've shared on the bug report, I'm lost. That
> log is huge. laptop-mode-tools will apply power savings to ethernet
> device. On boot, this happens quite early on. And probably that is
> causing the problem. But I'd still like to see what holds the device so
> long that NetworkManager fails to rename it. Does disabling the
> `ethernet` module in laptop-mode-tools solve your problem ? If so, as a
> workaround you can start with disabling it. And then try to investigate
> what may be causing the device to remain busy for so long.
>
> * There's a valid bug report #925944, where a side-effect of enabling
> power savings on the ethernet device results in NetworkManager not
> considering the device. I am not sure how that should be solved because
> how other tools (like NetworkManager, avahi etc) behave is beyond the
> scope. But, if the integration of these tools do not work proper,
> disabling one of the tools (like laptop-mode-tools) or a particular
> hardware power savings (like ethernet module), could be a viable
> option.
>
>
> Coming up with an ideal default is challenging and I struggle to find a
> balance. We do have /etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/board-specific/ . It is
> documented in the manpage.
>
>
> For the case of #925944, I think we should remove eth0 from the default
> list. Because most devices these days have a unique persistent name and
> it is best left to the user to find out the name and populate it in the
> configuration file. That is what my upload today, 1.73.1-2 does.
>
>
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 23:32 +0800, wg...@china.com wrote:
> > OK, thank you very much! I will wait for all things are fine again!
> > Thank you again!
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----原始邮件-----
> > > 发件人: "Michael Biebl" <bi...@debian.org>
> > > 发送时间: 2020-02-26 23:09:22 (星期三)
> > > 收件人: wg...@china.com, 952...@bugs.debian.org,
> > > laptop-mode-to...@packages.debian.org
> > > 抄送:
> > > 主题: Re: Bug#952506: Re: Bug#952506: Wired interface name maybe
> > > changed when reboot
> > >
> > > Control: reassign -1 laptop-mode-tools
> > > Control: retitle -1 lmt breaks network interface renaming
> > > Control: severity -1 serious
> > >
> > > Am 26.02.20 um 16:01 schrieb wg...@china.com:
> > > > As your recommendation, I removed the laptop-mode-tools, it seems
> > > > that wired interface' name is correct for several boot. But if
> > > > there is no laptop-mode-tools, how I using its function for
> > > > saving power to laptop?
> > >
> > > Don't use laptop-mode-tools. The kernel does it sufficiently well
> > > on
> > > it's own these days. I'm not actually sure what business
> > > laptop-mode-tools has with your network interfaces.
> > >
> > > I'm going to reassign this bug report to laptop-mode-tools and
> > > bumping
> > > the severity to RC.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> --
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
> Debian - The Universal Operating System
