Bug#956585: openjfx: FTBFS on all making openjfx uninstallable
Le 19/04/2020 à 20:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : > 11.0.7+0-2 still FTBFS on arm64 & mips*, will you still file the RM bugs > for openjfx & zeroc-ice to unblock the testing migration or shall I? Yes go ahead with the RM, thank you for the help. Emmanuel Bourg
Bug#956585: openjfx: FTBFS on all making openjfx uninstallable
On 4/13/20 7:48 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 13/04/2020 à 19:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : > >> It looks like the changes in openjfx (11.0.7+0-2) won't be enough to fix >> the FTBFS on mips* as well. > > I've noticed a segfault in the build log on mips64el. I have no idea how > to address this, this sounds like a compiler bug. > >> Will openjfx & zeroc-ice be removed from those architectures to allow it >> to migrate to testing if that's the case? > > I'll request the mips binaries to be removed if it still doesn't work. 11.0.7+0-2 still FTBFS on arm64 & mips*, will you still file the RM bugs for openjfx & zeroc-ice to unblock the testing migration or shall I? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#956585: openjfx: FTBFS on all making openjfx uninstallable
Le 13/04/2020 à 19:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : > It looks like the changes in openjfx (11.0.7+0-2) won't be enough to fix > the FTBFS on mips* as well. I've noticed a segfault in the build log on mips64el. I have no idea how to address this, this sounds like a compiler bug. > Will openjfx & zeroc-ice be removed from those architectures to allow it > to migrate to testing if that's the case? I'll request the mips binaries to be removed if it still doesn't work. Emmanuel Bourg
Bug#956585: openjfx: FTBFS on all making openjfx uninstallable
On 4/13/20 12:19 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > The recent update to 11.0.7+0-1 fails to build and several architectures, > most importantly on all making the openjfx package uninstallable, and in > turn preventing the josm build in unstable: It looks like the changes in openjfx (11.0.7+0-2) won't be enough to fix the FTBFS on mips* as well. Will openjfx & zeroc-ice be removed from those architectures to allow it to migrate to testing if that's the case? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#956585: openjfx: FTBFS on all making openjfx uninstallable
Source: openjfx
Version: 11.0.7+0-1
Followup-For: Bug #956585
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
Decreasing jfx.gradle.version.min from 4.8 to 4.4 in build.properties
per the attached patch works for me.
Kind Regards,
Bas
>From 499d1db3bf478e39a0f577b38e3eda7197662e1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bas Couwenberg
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:41:24 +0200
Subject: Decrease jfx.gradle.version.min from 4.8 to 4.4.
---
debian/changelog | 7 +++
debian/patches/32-gradle-compatibility.patch | 13 -
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 1b85f2bd6..b872ed3a4 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+openjfx (11.0.7+0-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Decrease jfx.gradle.version.min from 4.8 to 4.4.
+
+ -- Bas Couwenberg Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:40:49 +0200
+
openjfx (11.0.7+0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff --git a/debian/patches/32-gradle-compatibility.patch
b/debian/patches/32-gradle-compatibility.patch
index c0fe4911a..d44aacec8 100644
--- a/debian/patches/32-gradle-compatibility.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/32-gradle-compatibility.patch
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Author: Emmanuel Bourg
Forwarded: not-needed
--- a/settings.gradle
+++ b/settings.gradle
-@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
+@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ project(":systemTests").projectDir = fil
// Stable publishing behavior is the default in gradle 5.x.
// This setting enables it in gradle 4.8 to help with the transition.
@@ -12,3 +12,14 @@ Forwarded: not-needed
def closedDir = file("../rt-closed")
def buildClosed = closedDir.isDirectory()
+--- a/build.properties
b/build.properties
+@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ jfx.build.jdk.buildnum.min=46
+ # The jfx.gradle.version.min property defines the minimum version of gradle
+ # that is supported. It must be <= jfx.gradle.version.
+ jfx.gradle.version=5.3
+-jfx.gradle.version.min=4.8
++jfx.gradle.version.min=4.4
+
+ # Toolchains
+ jfx.build.linux.gcc.version=gcc8.2.0-OL6.4+1.0
--
2.20.1
Bug#956585: openjfx: FTBFS on all making openjfx uninstallable
Source: openjfx Version: 11.0.7+0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so Control: affects -1 src:josm Dear Maintainer, The recent update to 11.0.7+0-1 fails to build and several architectures, most importantly on all making the openjfx package uninstallable, and in turn preventing the josm build in unstable: The following packages have unmet dependencies: openjfx : Depends: libopenjfx-java which is a virtual package and is not provided by any available package The openjfx build log shows: FAIL: Gradle version too old: 4.4.1; must be at least 4.8 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openjfx=all=11.0.7%2B0-1=1586539559=0 Kind Regards, Bas
