Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
Package updated with Vcs in Salsa. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/suede Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/suede/suede_0.2.5-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Using new DH level format. Consequently: - debian/compat: removed. - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13. * debian/control: - Added Homepage field in source stanza. - Added Rules-Requires-Root field in source stanza. - Added Vcs-* fields in source stanza. - Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. * debian/copyright: - Migrated to 1.0 format. - Updated all data. * debian/salsa-ci.yml: added to provide CI tests for Salsa. * debian/source/lintian-overrides: added to explain missing version in watch file. * debian/upstream/metadata: added. * debian/watch: added an empty file except for a comment to explain about the current status of the upstream distribution site. Regards, Em 24/06/2020 10:45, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich escreveu: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "suede" > > * Package name: suede >Version : 0.2.5-3 >Upstream Author : Ramanan V (krosstok) > * URL : https://www.gnome-look.org/p/1108706/ > * License : GPL-2+ > * Vcs : None >Section : gnome > > It builds those binary packages: > > gnome-icon-theme-suede - Suede GTK+ icon theme > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/suede > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/suede/suede_0.2.5-3.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > >* QA upload. >* Using new DH level format. Consequently: >- debian/compat: removed. >- debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in > Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13. >* debian/control: >- Added Homepage field in source stanza. >- Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' in source stanza. >- Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. >* debian/copyright: >- Migrated to 1.0 format. >- Updated all data. >* debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status of > the > original upstream homepage. > > Regards, > -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ D03D 4FB3 B4D3 7EF6 3B2E ⠈⠳⣄ GPG:rsa4096/7EF63B2E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:19:58 -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > > You can add a watchfile that is empty except for a comment explaining > > the situation. > > > That looks good, it's also what lintian recommends right? Yes, I think so. > Changed debian/watch to: > > version=4 > # This package does not have an active upstream and the latest upstream > # distribution mechanism cannot be meaningfully monitored by uscan. Looks good (although you probably don't need the version.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Joe Cocker: Just Like A Woman signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
Em 26/06/2020 08:28, gregor herrmann escreveu: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:36:56 -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > >> Em 25/06/2020 18:19, Adam Borowski escreveu: >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich >>> wrote: * debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status of the original upstream homepage. >>> >>> Could you tell me what's the point of the last bit? I see no upside of >>> producing bogus data for the watch file. >> >> The idea there was to show the watch file was not ignored, but there's >> nothing to >> track actually, it's a dead project, at least for now. >> If someone decide to continue the project, and publish it somewhere, it's >> just a >> matter to update the watch file. >> Do you think would be better to just not provide the file? > > You can add a watchfile that is empty except for a comment explaining > the situation. > > Cheers, > gregor > That looks good, it's also what lintian recommends right? So I'm gonna go with that. Changed debian/watch to: version=4 # This package does not have an active upstream and the latest upstream # distribution mechanism cannot be meaningfully monitored by uscan. And updated changelog to: * debian/watch: added an empty file exept for a comment to explain about the current status of the upstream distribution site. Looks allright? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ D03D 4FB3 B4D3 7EF6 3B2E ⠈⠳⣄ GPG:rsa4096/7EF63B2E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:36:56 -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > Em 25/06/2020 18:19, Adam Borowski escreveu: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich > > wrote: > >>* debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status > >> of the > >> original upstream homepage. > > > > Could you tell me what's the point of the last bit? I see no upside of > > producing bogus data for the watch file. > > The idea there was to show the watch file was not ignored, but there's > nothing to > track actually, it's a dead project, at least for now. > If someone decide to continue the project, and publish it somewhere, it's > just a > matter to update the watch file. > Do you think would be better to just not provide the file? You can add a watchfile that is empty except for a comment explaining the situation. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Aimee Mann: Stupid Thing signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
Em 25/06/2020 18:19, Adam Borowski escreveu: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: >> * Package name: suede >>Version : 0.2.5-3 > >> Changes since the last upload: >> >>* QA upload. >>* Using new DH level format. Consequently: >>- debian/compat: removed. >>- debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in >> Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13. >>* debian/control: >>- Added Homepage field in source stanza. >>- Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' in source stanza. >>- Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. >>* debian/copyright: >>- Migrated to 1.0 format. >>- Updated all data. >>* debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status of >> the >> original upstream homepage. > > Could you tell me what's the point of the last bit? I see no upside of > producing bogus data for the watch file. > > > Meow! > Hi, The idea there was to show the watch file was not ignored, but there's nothing to track actually, it's a dead project, at least for now. If someone decide to continue the project, and publish it somewhere, it's just a matter to update the watch file. Do you think would be better to just not provide the file? Thanks. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ D03D 4FB3 B4D3 7EF6 3B2E ⠈⠳⣄ GPG:rsa4096/7EF63B2E
Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > * Package name: suede >Version : 0.2.5-3 > Changes since the last upload: > >* QA upload. >* Using new DH level format. Consequently: >- debian/compat: removed. >- debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in > Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13. >* debian/control: >- Added Homepage field in source stanza. >- Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' in source stanza. >- Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. >* debian/copyright: >- Migrated to 1.0 format. >- Updated all data. >* debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status of > the > original upstream homepage. Could you tell me what's the point of the last bit? I see no upside of producing bogus data for the watch file. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good. ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- on #linux-sunxi ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#963613: RFS: suede/0.2.5-3 [QA] -- Suede GTK+ icon theme
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "suede" * Package name: suede Version : 0.2.5-3 Upstream Author : Ramanan V (krosstok) * URL : https://www.gnome-look.org/p/1108706/ * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs : None Section : gnome It builds those binary packages: gnome-icon-theme-suede - Suede GTK+ icon theme To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/suede Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/suede/suede_0.2.5-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. * Using new DH level format. Consequently: - debian/compat: removed. - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13. * debian/control: - Added Homepage field in source stanza. - Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' in source stanza. - Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0. * debian/copyright: - Migrated to 1.0 format. - Updated all data. * debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status of the original upstream homepage. Regards, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ D03D 4FB3 B4D3 7EF6 3B2E ⠈⠳⣄ GPG:rsa4096/7EF63B2E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
