Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Lilly kill all On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 4:54 AM Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi release team, > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > ros-roscpp-core > ros-ros-comm > ros-geometric-shapes > ros-urdf > ros-interactive-markers > ros-actionlib > ros-geometry2 > ros-vision-opencv > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) > > The generated Ben files are ok. > > Cheers Jochen > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: bullseye/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > >
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Hi Jochen On 2020-07-01 11:29:53 +0200, jspri...@debian.org wrote: > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-07-01 11:22]: > > > > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-06-28 22:58]: > > > > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > > > > > > > > > > > ros-roscpp-core > > > > > > ros-ros-comm > > > > > > ros-geometric-shapes > > > > > > ros-urdf > > > > > > ros-interactive-markers > > > > > > ros-actionlib > > > > > > ros-geometry2 > > > > > > ros-vision-opencv > > > > > > > > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > > > > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) > > > > > > > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? > > > > > > > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail). > > > > > > Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the > > > uploads to unstable. > > > > The binNMus for mrpt (#964044) and ros-rviz failed. Could you please > > take a look at ros-rviz? > > ros-rviz got stuck in NEW and I didn't notice when testing, sorry. I pinged > ftp-masters and will backport the fix tonight, otherwise. Thanks! > Fun fact, mrpt compiled fine for me locally. The failure appears to be caused by a flaky test. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Hi Sebastian, * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-07-01 11:22]: > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-06-28 22:58]: > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > > > > > ros-roscpp-core > > > ros-ros-comm > > > ros-geometric-shapes > > > ros-urdf > > > ros-interactive-markers > > > ros-actionlib > > > ros-geometry2 > > > ros-vision-opencv > > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail). Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the uploads to unstable. The binNMus for mrpt (#964044) and ros-rviz failed. Could you please take a look at ros-rviz? ros-rviz got stuck in NEW and I didn't notice when testing, sorry. I pinged ftp-masters and will backport the fix tonight, otherwise. Fun fact, mrpt compiled fine for me locally. Thanks for taking care of the binNMUs. Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Hi Jochen On 2020-06-29 21:48:01 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Hi Jochen > > On 2020-06-29 19:05:00 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-06-28 22:58]: > > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > > > > > > > ros-roscpp-core > > > > ros-ros-comm > > > > ros-geometric-shapes > > > > ros-urdf > > > > ros-interactive-markers > > > > ros-actionlib > > > > ros-geometry2 > > > > ros-vision-opencv > > > > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) > > > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? > > > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail). > > Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the > uploads to unstable. The binNMus for mrpt (#964044) and ros-rviz failed. Could you please take a look at ros-rviz? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Jochen On 2020-06-29 19:05:00 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-06-28 22:58]: > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > > > > > ros-roscpp-core > > > ros-ros-comm > > > ros-geometric-shapes > > > ros-urdf > > > ros-interactive-markers > > > ros-actionlib > > > ros-geometry2 > > > ros-vision-opencv > > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail). Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the uploads to unstable. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Hi Sebastian, * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-06-28 22:58]: I would like to transition these packages to unstable: ros-roscpp-core ros-ros-comm ros-geometric-shapes ros-urdf ros-interactive-markers ros-actionlib ros-geometry2 ros-vision-opencv Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail). Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Hi Jochen On 2020-06-27 11:50:12 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi release team, > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable: > > ros-roscpp-core > ros-ros-comm > ros-geometric-shapes > ros-urdf > ros-interactive-markers > ros-actionlib > ros-geometry2 > ros-vision-opencv > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, I would like to transition these packages to unstable: ros-roscpp-core ros-ros-comm ros-geometric-shapes ros-urdf ros-interactive-markers ros-actionlib ros-geometry2 ros-vision-opencv Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time? (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.) The generated Ben files are ok. Cheers Jochen -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
