Bug#966680: src:acpica-unix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Hi Al, On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 22:08:25 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > In case you didn't notice; s390x is fixed now. The package FTBFS on > > armhf and mips64el. > > Friendly ping. Friendly ping again. We're now in the first phase of the freeze for bullseye. It would be good, for all I guess, if your work since October 2019 gets included in bullseye. bullseye currently has 20190509-1. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#966680: src:acpica-unix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Hi Al, On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:26:08 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Al, > > On 24-09-2020 18:57, Al Stone wrote: > > Yup, working on it. I may have to turn off s390x support for the > > short term; the issue is that this package is solely little-endian > > upstream and it has been patched and bodged so many times for > > big-endian support, it has been become unmaintainable for big- > > endian. These patches are being re-done and made straightforward > > but it is taking a lot longer than hoped; ideally, I can get them > > upstreamed and simplify further. > > In case you didn't notice; s390x is fixed now. The package FTBFS on > armhf and mips64el. Friendly ping. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#966680: src:acpica-unix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Hi Al, On 24-09-2020 18:57, Al Stone wrote: > Yup, working on it. I may have to turn off s390x support for the > short term; the issue is that this package is solely little-endian > upstream and it has been patched and bodged so many times for > big-endian support, it has been become unmaintainable for big- > endian. These patches are being re-done and made straightforward > but it is taking a lot longer than hoped; ideally, I can get them > upstreamed and simplify further. In case you didn't notice; s390x is fixed now. The package FTBFS on armhf and mips64el. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#966680: src:acpica-unix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
On 24 Sep 2020 11:23, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Al, > > ping > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:34:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new > > bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. > > acpica-unix is a key package and will not be autoremoved. Can you please > fix the situation? > > Paul Yup, working on it. I may have to turn off s390x support for the short term; the issue is that this package is solely little-endian upstream and it has been patched and bodged so many times for big-endian support, it has been become unmaintainable for big- endian. These patches are being re-done and made straightforward but it is taking a lot longer than hoped; ideally, I can get them upstreamed and simplify further. -- Ciao, al -- Al Stone Debian Developer E-mail: a...@ahs3.nethttp://www.debian.org a...@debian.org -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#966680: src:acpica-unix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Hi Al, ping On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:34:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new > bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. acpica-unix is a key package and will not be autoremoved. Can you please fix the situation? Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#966680: src:acpica-unix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Source: acpica-unix Version: 20190509-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 20200528-1 Tags: sid bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:acpica-unix in its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable. If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=acpica-unix signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
